Hi there -
I've heard that news, and while it might help work towards a cure, its very new, and not anywhere near being a cure yet. A cure is still many many years away.
Aj
Thanks
I think with the information above and the length of time since possible infection in conjunction with a score far below the 3.0-3.5 range, I am safe. I don't want to face this again.
Have you heard that there is a possible advancement towards a cure. Scientist in North Carolina may have discoverd a way to bring the virus out its dormant state then kill it before it replicates. I don't know if it has merrit. It is all aver my head but just thought you might find it interesting
Thanks for what this group does and good luck to you
There is debate because so many under 3.5 turn out to be false positives.
I agree fully with Dr. Hook.
Good luck,
Aj
Again with the questions. Why is there the debate on the where the cutoff should be for a positive test. I obviously want it to be a higher score to indicate a positve result.
Also is a burning sensationin the penis (urinary tract) associated with herpes.
I did consult with Dr. Hook and he said due to no outbreak and a "low positive" score that I may not have herpes and unless I get an outbreak I should "worry no further". I am taking his advice but willl from now on be much more careful.
And background noise is due more with testing conditions than anything else .
I have hsv2, and I could get a 4.6 today, and tomorrow would get a 5.7. It doesn't mean I am any more positive tomorrow than I was today, it just means a different test kit was used, it might be warmer or cooler in the lab, a different tech might be reading it, etc.
Aj
No, none of that would have contributed.
There is a lot of debate in this field as to the cut offs for type 2. Many feel that it needs to be higher than 1.10, and that anything under a 3.5 should be negative, or at least confirmed.
Aj