Thank you doctor Oyakawa. I really appreciate your perspective as I consider what decision to make.
Thank you so much for the post. I really want to feel like I am making the right decision and the discussion helps.
You have a very difficult situation with different opinions among doctors.
First, what is the visual potential in left eye? If a RAM or PAM test shows a macular vision of 20/20 to 20/25, I would consider an accommodating IOL. Many doctors would not want to put in a silicone IOL in a patient who had a retinal detachment in case it detaches again and needs silicone oil. My feeling is that eyes that need silicone oil rarely recover good vision. I had a retinal detachment and ERM peel and had a Crystalens implanted.
2) With a toric IOL you will need a reading glasses for the left eye. However, at 45 your good eye with contact lens with still have fairly good accommodation. You could use a reader of different powers for the right and left eye.
3) Depends on what your needs are. Most would not target more than -1.25 to -1.50. This would give good intermediate vision.
Dr. O
This is a very interesting question. I'll be interested to see what the doctors on the forum recommend.
I do have one anecdotal comment to share. The optometrist I see has a wife who was a -12D in both eyes; as I am also a high myope we often discussed her case in conjunction with my ongoing issues.
In her 40s this woman developed a cataract in one eye and had it removed and replaced with a single vision IOL. Rather than try to correct the other eye with a contact, a few weeks later she had an implantable contact lens (ICL) placed in the other eye (without removing the natural lens in that eye, which was cataract free then). This allowed her to have corrected vision in both eyes for distance without contacts or glasses, although she did need reading glasses for near/intermediate vision.
All went well for her and she was very happy. That said, 8 years later she has now developed a cataract in the eye with the natural lens in place, behind the ICL that was implanted. So she now need a surgery to remove the ICL and also remove her natural lens and replace it with an IOL of some power. This is a more complicated surgery than a straight cataract removal/replacement.
She told me her medical insurance paid for placement of the ICL at the time of the first cataract surgery, due to the visual disparity she otherwise would have had (with 20/20 vision in one eye and -12D in the other). Of course, that was years ago.
Good luck with your future vision struggles. You are not alone!