Aa
Aa
A
A
A
Close
233488 tn?1310693103

MONOVISION OR MULTIFOCAL IOL

This study was in the Sept issue of Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 35:1501;2009

Reading ability with pseudophakic monovision and with refractive multifocal IOLs: comparative study
Misae Ito and Kimiya Shimizu

CONCLUSION: The monovision method group had better reading ability however careful patient selection is essential

JCH MD
4 Responses
Sort by: Helpful Oldest Newest
233488 tn?1310693103
MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL
-
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal
Dr. Burton Kushner at the University of Wisconsin has published several articles about patient selection for full monovision.  (Try googling.)  My impression is that although there are no guarantees about who will have problems, anyone with a history of strabismus should definitely avoid it.  Probably people with a phoria (good eye alignment with both eyes, but eye turning when one eye is covered) aren't great candidates either.  (Many people who have a phoria aren't aware of it.)  Based on my personal experience, I also think that anyone with sub-normal vision in one eye (e.g., residual distortion from a retinal condition) would be happier with both eyes set for the same target.

When monovision works, it gives the sense of having continuously sharp vision (as if you never developed presbyopia if the targets are distance/near), as long as the difference between the targets doesn't exceed 2 diopters.  (With a difference greater than 2 diopters, there would probably be a gap in sharp vision.)  Most people would not be aware of a loss of depth impression, and glare and halos should not be a problem.  I don't think any of the currently available premium IOLs can offer this.
Helpful - 0
233488 tn?1310693103
MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL
If you use the search feature and archives you will see many scores of discussions about what people expect from multifocals and also from monovision. Some expectations are totally unrealistic. The secret is trying to make each patient understand what is reasonable. Many people think that because they pay several thousand dollars extra that they can buy a eye that works as good as when they were 16. Isn't going to happen.

JCH MD
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal
Thank you so much for that piece of info!
If possible, could you highlight the "patient selection" requirement?  

Thanks!

I am taking the forum's vast wealth of knowledge and experience and decided on mono-vision (near/intermediate) for my surgery.  One eye is already near (-3.5D), so the other will be targetted for computer reading.  Progressive glasses for everything out in the yonder.  Crossing my fingers that I don't get dizzy!  
Helpful - 0
Have an Answer?

You are reading content posted in the Eye Care Community

Top General Health Answerers
177275 tn?1511755244
Kansas City, MO
Avatar universal
Grand Prairie, TX
Avatar universal
San Diego, CA
Learn About Top Answerers
Didn't find the answer you were looking for?
Ask a question
Popular Resources
Discharge often isn't normal, and could mean an infection or an STD.
In this unique and fascinating report from Missouri Medicine, world-renowned expert Dr. Raymond Moody examines what really happens when we almost die.
Think a loved one may be experiencing hearing loss? Here are five warning signs to watch for.
When it comes to your health, timing is everything
We’ve got a crash course on metabolism basics.
Learn what you can do to avoid ski injury and other common winter sports injury.