Good grief. I don't ask much of the people who seek information on this forum. But I do request that they read my responses and at least try to understand them.
IF you had a cut in the ear, and IF someone dripped HIV infected blood into the ear, there MIGHT be a small risk of transmission. Neither of those things happened. Therefore, there was no risk.
Please re-read my orginal response. Don't most any more irrelevant follow-up comments or I will delete the entire thread without further comment.
What do you mean by "theoretically if you had a cut in your ear, and if blood drippe into your ear?" If both of the above are true, are you saying that I DO or DO NOT stand a risk of contracting HIV?
Responding only to the title you chose for your question, before reading anything else: The ear is lined with skin, not mucous membranes -- i.e., much more like your hand or arm, not like the inside of the genital tract or rectum. Getting HIV secretions in the ear is not likely to result in HIV transmission, and to my knowledge this has never happened once in the quarter century of the world wide HIV/AIDS epidemic. I doubt you will be the first.
Now I have read the question. You weren't at risk. I suppose theoretically if you had a cut in the ear, and if blood dripped into your ear. But not a droplet of saliva or other secretions. Look at it this way: people who live in the same house as perosns with HIV (and are not sex or needle-sharing partners), even for years and years, never get HIV, even if they share bathrooms, showers, eating untensils, etc, and even if they love, hug, and cuddle the infected person. For example, parents never catch HIV from their infected children, even with diaper changing etc.
No risk. And no, you don't need testing.
Regards-- HHH, MD
In addition to my above question, if I had a laceration or cut in my ear, would that lead to HIV contraction?