Many (most? all?) online sites simply list symptoms, without clarifying the important limitations: First, that acute HIV presents with combinations of symptoms, almost never with only 1 or 2 of them (fever in particular is important, i.e. its absence of fever is pretty strong evidence against HIV, regardless of other symptoms). Second, that almost of the listed symptoms occur large numbers of other health problems, everything from the common cold to pneumonia to urinary infections to rheumatoid arthritis and a hundred other things. Almost all of those are more common than acute HIV.
These are the reasons that symptoms almost never are useful indicators of new HIV infection. Risk assessment and blood test results tell the truth; symptoms rarely do.
You can find many other detailed discussions of these issues on this forum. Use the search link and enter such terms as "HIV symptoms", "ARS symptoms", and so on.
To my knowledge there are no data on altered transmission risk based on lubricant use, but I don't see why it would make any significant difference.
Welcome to the HIV forum. You asked the same question on the STD forum; I deleted it.
Sex with an escort: Very low risk. Few up-scale (high cost) sex workers, i.e. escorts, have HIV. And you had condom-protected sex, meaning no risk for HIV. As you now apparently realize, the symptoms you describe were definitely not a reason for antibiotic therapy. If you saw a health care provider who prescribed the Augmentin on that basis, shame on him or her; if you decided on treatment yourself, e.g. with left over drug in your medicine cabinet, bad move. That said, it made no difference in your zero risk for HIV. To your specific questions:
1) I don't know the reason for the muscle and joint pain. It is not due to the antibiotic or to HIV. Maybe an emotional/psychologic origin? Or a minor viral infection?
2) HIV is a virus. No antibiotic has any effect on any virus, including HIV. The Augmentin had no effect at all on HIV test reliabiliy, and would have had no effect on symptoms of new HIV infection.
3) The counselor is correct. This has been discussed many times on this forum. Try using the search function, entering something like "time to positive HIV test" or "HIV seroconversion" or "window period".
4) That statistic is about right. Actually, 1 chance in 2,000 is closer to the truth. And that's IF the woman has HIV; and without condom.
Bottom line: No serious worries about HIV in this situation. But see a health care provider if your symptoms persist or you remain concerned about them.
Regards-- HHH, MD
Thanks, I took aspirin and went to the gym and my joint/muscle aches seem to be less now
would that 1 in 1000 or 2000 stat hold true if lubricant was used?
Thanks Dr... Just one more quick question, how come many sites on the Internet mention joint/muscle pain as a symptom. Both you and the counselor said that it is NOT an initIal HIV symptom but many sites out there on the web says that it is?? Of course I will go by what you and the counselor say however just want to absolutely be sure that I can dismiss the joint/muscle pain I am having? And why all the bad information on the web? Even on sites that seem pretty credible.... Any way I really appreciate your help!