Welcome to the Forum. There is much misinformation "out there", particularly on the internet. For HIV to be spread through non-sexual means, the virus must be injected deep into tissue. Surface contamination does not transmit infection, even when there are cracks or sores on the skin surface. While I guess there is some theoretical risk the fact is that, for practical purposes HIV is not spread this way. Thus, even if this person has HIV (which is unlikely) there is no risk an no need for testing.
I hope my comments are helpful. Please do not worry. EWH
No change in my answer. Time for you to stop worrying. Enjoy the holiday. EWH
Hi Doctor, I'm really sorry to come back to this again but one thing has been concerning me which I forgot to mention in my original question and I don't know who else I can ask. About 10 minutes after the contact I washed my hands and dabbed one of the cracks with a piece of white tissue and noticed a small speck of blood. This makes me think that it may have been bleeding a little when contact was made. Does this change your answer? Hope you can answer as this has been concerning me and I apologise for asking you again. This will be my final question I promise.
It is time for this thread to end and for you to stop worrying. No, in the situation you describe the amount does not matter. EWH
Hi Doctor,
Can I just ask - would the amount of blood make any difference, as I recall the guy's blood covered his thumb nail so was quite a bit.
Thanks once again.
Correct, this is still too shallow and superficial to represent a risk for infection. Do not worry. EWH
Hi Doctor, sorry but just one very last question for clarification. One of the cracks was right on the fold a knuckle meaning it could open from time to time and possibly a bit deeper?. Would that mean that it (the tissue wound) was still not deep enough? Thank you.