Thanks for your valuable input guys.Appreciate it a lot.
Bless y'all.
Fear-mongering is everywhere & it will continue to happen.Many websites do this because they either don't update their information or they just simply have no knowledge about HIV transmission.
Makes sense. Thanks for the info. American media fear-mongering culture has petrified me of catching it. I just figure I should get the actual facts since they are available through informed folks, such as yourself. It's a great thing you all do.
When the virus is exposed to air it becomes inactive & unable to infect you.Transmission of HIV only takes place inside the body not outside it.With a syringe,the blood has not been exposed to air therefore it remains active.That's why sharing needles is high risk because the virus is still active,however on the tip of a syringe that's not always the case because that blood has been exposed to air & thus the virus has become inactive.
Do you mean the blood that would remain in the needle or would some have to be sucked into the actual vial and then injected into someone else?
I'm not an IV drug user, just curious how it seems to be an exponentially larger risk than unprotected vaginal intercourse, which would logically seem to be equally effective in transmission of the virus. But I am aware the statistics and scientific research don't back up my "logic."
There is no air inside a syringe therefore the virus is still active.
How can it live in a syringe, but not anywhere else outside of the host?
You never had an exposure.
HIV is unable to reproduce outside its living host (unlike many bacteria or fungi, which may do so under suitable conditions), except under laboratory conditions; therefore, it does not spread or maintain infectiousness outside its host.
HIV is transmitted by;
Unprotected penetrative anal and/or vaginal sex
Sharing works with other IV drug users
Mother to child
Jack, there is no cause of concern.