Thank you for your quick response and explanation.
You mention "a healing cut almost certainly makes no difference". I do not know whether or not my surface cuts were healing at the time of the fingering. They could have been fresh surface cuts and bleeding.
Even if they were fresh, bleeding surface cuts would this still be a zero risk event?
Thank you for your patience.
Welcome back to the forum.
This was a zero risk exposure. There has never been a known case of HIV transmission by fingering. A fresh, deep, actively bleeding wound might create some risk, but a healing cut almost certainly makes no difference. The scientific reasons are simply that catching HIV requires exposure of certain cells to large amounts of the virus -- and the amount of virus that can enter through exposures like this simply is not enough for transmission to occur. I would also add that it is statistically unlikely your partner had HIV.
You do not need testing and can safely continue unprotected sex with your wife. Before you ask additional questions on this forum, please remember this: sexual transmission of HIV requires a bare penis (no condom) inside another person's vagina, rectum, or (maybe) mouth. If you do not have unprotected vaginal or anal sex with a high risk partner, you will never catch HIV. Never, no chance, nil, nichevo, zilch, nada. Got it?
Regards-- HHH, MD