And why this cannot happen in a very quick contact vaginal fluids->fingers->urethra ?
Yes the theory is that it deactivates when it hits the air. The needle supposedly shields it and provides a vehicle to transfer it to another host. This has been a concern for me as well. Seems strange but I guess it just happens right away.
In the needle the blood never touchs the air, it's never exposed to the air
* Anyone who continues to post excessively, questioning a conclusively negative result or no-risk situation, will be subject to action by MedHelp. Conclusively negative results or a no-risk situation will be based upon the criteria established by MedHelp’s doctors. Action will be taken as follows:
* After excessive posting, a warning will be issued by MedHelp
* Continuing to post regarding the negative result / no risk situation will result in a 3 day suspension
* Continuing to post upon your return will result in a permanent ban.
this does not answer my question because the blood in the needle in scenario 2 is outside the body
HIV is not transmitted outside the body.
what about scenario 2? the finger covered with vaginal fluids is placed directly on the urethra.
I still see no difference
Drug injections...the needle is placed directly into the blood stream.
I am trying to understand the difference between the two scenarios.
I'd like to know why a person could get infection in scenario 1 and not in scenario 2
what r u looking for? vaginal fluid after exposing to air while touching to urethra the virus in the fluid becomes inactive and could not cause infection..
chintu58
Either accept it or don't but move on.