Interesting and thank you for the responses. Years ago clincs were recommending getting tested after 6 weeks of possible infection, but as I said now, the CDC is saying 12 weeks for first test and then 24 weeks for a second test. Unless you were sexually active during that period I would see no reason to get a test any early than 12 to 24 weeks. However, as you said if the new tests can accurately detect HIV at 6 weeks with a conclusive test, than that is great.
a. NO MEDICINE can delay seroconversion, just not possible.
b. NO, testing would not depend on the risk,irrespective of low or high, a risk is a risk , the reason it's said to be 6 -8 weeks conclusive because:
1. A test taken on the 6-8 week would always give you a reliable result
2. Since average would seroconvert within 14 to 22 days after the exposure and few go up to 4 to 6 week - 6 months(people with shattered immune system, iv drug user etc.)
4. Detectable amount of antibodies would always be shown in the test result after two weeks preceding seroconversion
5. Having said that all by 6 week a person should get an indicative result when tested by any generation of the test
6. 12 weeks recommended by CDC is very very conservative and also an old piece of info, new generation of tests (III & IV) have indeed minimized the window period to 6 /8 weeks
Mike
No antibiotic will affect the HIV it is that much strong. So it will not affect widow period, Testing , or antibody production.
Standered window period that i belive is 3 months . But i hope 6-8 weeks will be ok.If you test in window period you may get a false negative test.
S