no biggie...I'll just pay the $22 to ask.
Thanks for all input.
Teak,
I see that you answer quite a few questions on here and seem quite knowledgeable about HIV. May I ask, Have you ever heard of someone getting infected with HIV this way? [When another male ejaculates on the unprotected head of another male to the point that the other partner's penis has been covered with semen?].
I am trying my best to rationalize this, since semen is considered a mechanism for HIV infection and the head of the penis has the urethra. My only practices with men in the last year have been receiving oral sex [from which I have read here is not a risk]. Your input is greatly appreciated.
How many times do you have to be told you never had an exposure?
Now I am terribly confused. Do I need testing? Ill get a positive result because of this event? This guy had his and my penis held together and ejaculated. When he ejaculated, the head of his penis was right next to mine and his semen covered the head of my penis. Not enough time to become inactive IF he was HIV+?
So do false positives when a test wasn't needed in the first place.
Thanks Vance and Nursegirl. I do need to believe that and accept it. Sometimes accepting comes from testing.
NO risk. HIV cannot maintain its effectiveness outside of the body. You don't have an HIV concern.
His responce was reported because of inaccurate information given on this forum. Not just to you but to many others.
I did re read them. The previous poster stated I needed testing..yet their response is not here. Don't know why. But I'll get tested in the next 6-8 weeks to be safe/sure. Thank you for your replies.
Nothing more to say, reread my responces.
Thank you
Thanks Vance for your response.
This guy, when rubbing (frottage) came a tremendous amount of semen. I would figure, after learning that there are receptive cells to HIV in the urethra and the tip of the urethra for HIV receptor cells. That is why I am concerned.
Have you ever heard of such a scenario? Ever heard of someone getting infected this way? I know this situation is different than a male ejaculating on a cut, because a cut on the body does not have the HIV receptor cells as the urethra of a penis has or the rectum.
Thanks vance.
So am I right to assume testing is not needed?
HIV is transmitted from:
Unprotected vaginal and/or anal sex
Mother to unborn/nursing baby
IV drug use
So..who do I believe? Is 9789 wrong???
He did cover the top/head of my penis with ejaculate.
No this is not a risk for HIV. HIV is not transmitted outside of he body. So his seman to start with you need more then a little, second the chance of it getting into your uretha is very very small and last once as the virus exits the body it is deactivated shoertly after that.
Again no risk.