I'm a bit surprised the people at your test site did not provide this information for you. Your test results indicate that you do not have HIV and there is no reason to be concerned that your sexual exposures prior to starting with your GF 7 months ago resulted in HIV. Your results are completely reliable and do not require further testing of any sort unless you or your GF have new partners. EWH
No. Your tests are negative. You do not have HIV and do not need further testing. EWH
So there is absolutely no way that I could have gotten it from those past exposures 7.5 months and more prior to my test and having the exposures to my girlfriend leading up to it will not alter the results of my test correct?
The figure you provide is in the right ballpark, particularly in Wisconsin where HIV rates tend to be lower than some other parts of the country. EWH
Yeah when I went in to get tested all they did really was ask me if I had any exposures within three months to this so they told me that it would be conclusive. I just wanted to make sure as before this relationship (over 7 months ago i was pretty careless and living a single life of a mid 20 year old man.)
Just one quick question if you have the time? Is it really true that the chances of an exposure with a person of unkown status is 1 in a million for a heterosexual male? I guess it makes sense since 1 million people have it in the USA which is made up of 303 million, and the million are males and females so that makes the population for a hetero male even smaller. Also I live in Wisconsin. Where does that relate to other states with HIV cases if you can provide that? Is it closer to the bottom, middle, top, etc.....
Thank you once again.