hiv from vaginal fluid

[DAVID4000]

Hi! I need to ask something.  I just went to a massage parlor and had a hand job from the masseuse.  Before she started the hand job, she touched her vagina.  I knew she was wet because I touched her vagina too.  Obviously, she would then have vaginal fluids in her hand. My question is, would I be in any danger of being infected with HIV if I had a hand job from a woman who's hand had vaginal fluid on it?

[1824]

Please help I wisted women she weard me condom while wearing condom her fingers touched to forehead penis 2 to 4 seconds  then I rubbed her then ejaculateted then safely I removed condom I am worring about veginal fluids on her hand or previous customer semen.. went to urethra or forehead when I  ejaculate please help

[AnxiousNoMore]

This answers all of your HIV questions, and if you can think of any more just reread about the 3. You had zero risk therefore  testing is irrelevant to your situation because you had zero risk. HIV is a fragile virus, which is instantly inactivated in air and also in saliva which means it is effectively dead so it can't infect from touching, external rubbing or oral activities. It doesn't matter if you and they were actively bleeding or had cuts at the time either because the HIV is effectively dead.  
Only 3 adult risks are the following:
1. unprotected penetrating vaginal with a penis. Only the head needs to be covered, so if that happened it is  protected and there is zero risk
2. unprotected penetrating anal sex with a penis. Only the head needs to be covered, so if that happened it is protected and there is zero risk.
3. sharing hollow needles that you inject with.
The only way to get HIV is if you did one of the 3. The situation you describe is a long way from any of these 3.
Even with blood, lactation, cuts, rashes, burns, etc the air or the saliva does not allow inactivated virus to infect from touching, external rubbing or oral activities. This HIV science is 40 years old and very well established, so no detail that you can add to your encounter will change it from zero risk. Because of all the research statistics, doctors have calculated the risk from what you describe to be less than that of being hit by a meteor, therefore no one will get HIV from what you did in the next 40 years of your life either.
If you didn't have one of the 3 then you are just worrying about your own hiv theory - which is unrealistic for you to think that can become reality - so you should move on back to your happy life instead.

[1824]

Thank you

[Teak]

Should have read, "wouldn't."

[Teak]

HIV is not transmitted by masturbation. It would matter if she had cervical fluid on her fingers. Still wouldn't be a risk.

[one_of_us]

So that means concentration of HIV in fluids that are actually able to infect are only present in the cervix and not near the vaginal opening. Is that correct!?...

[Teak]

Bartholin's glands are what continuously moistens the vaginal not cervical fluids.

[LIZZIE LOU]

i stand by my comment which is fully explained earlier in that post.  the main concern is that hiv is not transmitted OUTSIDE it's host.

[one_of_us]

Okay I'm sorry but I've been reading posts here to be better informed... I've found that Dr. HHH said...

http://www.medhelp.org/posts/HIV-Prevention/vaginal-fluid-in-urethra-through-mutual-masturbation/show/543093

" ...there is no way to separate cervical secretions from lubricating fluid.  Cervical secretions are produced continually by most women, and I would not assume that fluids near the vaginal opening come only from sexual lubrication; undoubtedly they usually (always?) include cervical secretions... "

I'm confused...

[LIZZIE LOU]

in a woman...hiv has found to be present way up in the vagina...close to the cervix.  the glans that are responsible for "lubrication" are totally different things.

[DAVID4000]

thank u and can u explained it

[LIZZIE LOU]

no