Correct. No risk even in this very unlikely scenario.
Great, thank you doctor! I know you were pointing out all of the reasons why transmission would not result but let's just say she does have HIV and her vomit did get on my hand, then transmission would still need an entry point and my intact skin (even with the biting of my nails and surrounding skin - i certainly did not have an actively bleeding cut of any kind) would have been a barrier to infection, right? Thank you again.
Welcome to the forum and thanks for your question. I'll try to help.
To my knowledge there are no data on HIV infectiousness of stomach contents, but I would guess no transmission would occur; stomach acid and digestive enzymes undoubtedly kill the virus. I would expect this to also be the case if blood were present. Cuts on the hands etc would make no difference. Except for fresh, deep, actively bleeding cuts, there is probably no transmission risk on exposure to HIV infected blood or body fluids.
The other question, of course, is whether your friend is likely to have HIV. If she is not in a classic high risk group (commercial sex worker, injection drug user, immigrant from Africa, etc) then you can safely assume she doesn't have it.
Finally, xxposure to blood or body secretions in the environment is one of those theoretical risks that have little basis in reality. There are about 60,000 new cases of HIV every year in the US, and I'll bet not a single one of them in the past 10 years has resulted from environmental exposure to blood.
For those reasons, you shouldn't be at all worried about HIV (or other blood borne infections) in this situation. All is well, you don't need testing, and can safely continue your current sexual relationship(s) without fear of transmitting anything to your partner(s).
Best regards-- HHH, MD