Big thanks to teak and rainlover71
Sorry, is the last comment change you opinion by the deep paper cut like change you option
No, and what does that have to do with getting poked with a lancet?
HIV is unable to reproduce outside its living host (unlike many bacteria or fungi, which may do so under suitable conditions), except under laboratory conditions; therefore, it does not spread or maintain infectiousness outside its host.
Sorry, is the last comment change you opinion by the deep paper cut like change you option
The reason you didn't have an exposure is lancets are not hollowcore needles.
Hiv becomes inactive and therefore unable to infect you once exposed to air,this is why you never had a risk.
We did not use the pan device, and the cut of finger is like a paper cut, but a little deeper. If the lancet has the blood of him, am I still being safe? Thanks teak, you are the truly, kindly expertise
Cuts aren't deep from a lancet and you never had an exposure.
At the beginning, I do not want to test, but by considering I am a fatty, so I was given a try. I do not think it is a smart move, but I do not know why I used the same lancet. Ew, the cut is deep which make me anxiety
At the beginning, I do not want to test, but by considering I am a fatty, so I was given a try. I do not think it is a smart move, but I do not know why I used the same lancet. Ew, the cut is deep which make me anxiety
Why would you share a lancet with your friend if you knew they were HIV positive? It wasn't a risk but it wasn't the smartest thing to do either.
You never had an exposure to HIV from a lancet.