lol im sorry man.. i didnt realize that teak answered that same question already in this post...i said if there was some blood in her mouth would it be a risk.. he said you still would not have a risk.. my bad i forgot he answered it .. thanks vance
It's time to move on from this. Your questions are anxiety driven and nothing more. Feel free to check out the anxiety community, but there is nothing more I can tell you.
saying that it would still be a no risk if they had blood not visible to the eye .. thats what i mean..
yea true dat... oh vance ... so if there was a lil blood that wasnt visible to the eye...that still wouldnt be enough right?
Also no one would receive oral sex from someone with a mouth full of blood, you would see blood pouring out of the mouth when that person opened up his/her mouth for insertion.
so its a no risk for receiving unprotected oral sex... no need to test... and it would only be a theoretical risk if someone had a mouth full of blood and it still wouldnt happen cause its theotretical..and plus no one would give head if someone had a mouth full of blood... SO BASICALLY NO RISK NO TEST... am i right vance?..this is last post..
Listen oral sex is no risk period. Nothing more to explain.
so just wondering why they say no risk at all no matter what kind of spin you put on it...just saying man..explain it please ...
No one can speak directly for her, but as I have said before unless you take a razor blade and cut the mouth of someone there is not enough blood in someones mouth to approach a risk. If someone had a mouth full of blood then that could pose a risk based on different factors. But no one is going to give oral sex with a mouth full of blood, it is just impossible, they would be in too much pain and probably faint from blood loss, there last concern would be oral sex.
cool man ..thats what i thought..i didnt think that even blood would cause a risk... yea i was stuck on that cause i was looking at aidsmeds.com and i seen ann said something bout unless you punch the person repeatidly in the mouth before receiving unprotected oral sex , there wouldnt be enough blood to worry about.. why does she say that though if it still isnt a risk ? just wondering .. i still believe your answer. just wanting to know what she means by that ..
You would still not have a risk.
thanks in advance by the way
Hey teak, man ive been doing alot better coping with my OCD.. and if you dont mind i just got one more question and your answer should help me get completely over the top... pretty much just wanna make sure I got this right... Even if I received a blowjob with no condom and lets just say she may have had some blood in her mouth that i didnt see... It would still be a no risk situation cause saliva inhibits Hiv if blood may have came from her mouth and therefore I still wouldn't need testing ? thats the last thing I been stuck on .. your answer will be very much appreciated.. have a great New Year.. thank you for your hard work you put in...
I appreciate your help Teak, may you have a wonderful Holiday.. and may God Bless You..
Still no risk.. Now get some help for your OCD. No more questions on this topic....
O yea..What if any of them had HIV?, its still a NO RISK , NO TEST situation ?
lol i know your probably going to be like WTF? lol .. but being I had no risk, that means no test.. Correct? I promise this is it...
You didn't have a risk like you were told back in July for the same situations. Seek help with your OCD.