The article has been from back in 1990s, look at the copyright. The status quo and the reality are against the view and they last until today.
ya but i guess the current view is quiet proven right? or can by any chance the rebels be right?
Rebels, those who don't want to accept the status quo even when the majority holds that view.
denialist means?pls didnt get it?
That's a denialist website and the Dr. that wrote the article is a denialist. MOVE ON.
through semen on intact skin as the paper says?
HIV is not transmitted through casual contact. PERIOD.
Such view isn't endorsed by the majority of HIV experts.
have you gone through it?
but this paper says some doctor has proved it it also says of possible transmission through casual contact?
Just a stray paper on the net can not be compared with wisdom, knowledge and know how gained through research, spread over 3 decades. HIV can not penetrate through an intact skin. Transmission routes are well known and established. Just to refresh, there are the only known routes as follows,
Sexual Routes
Unprotected anal and vaginal sex.
Non Sexual Routes
From mother to child, transfusion of unscreened and unsafe blood (still a problem in developing countries), sharing syringes (like drug addicts)
Any other transmission route, if mentioned anywhere, is certainly not for the HIV.