Christine I. Wooddell1, Deborah Chavez2, Jason E. Goetz-mann3, Bernadette Guerra2, Ryan M. Peterson1, Helen Lee2, Julia O. Hegge1, Robert Gish4, Stephen Locarnini5, Christopher R. Anzalone1, Robert E. Lanford2, David L. Lewis1;
1Arrowhead Madison, Arrowhead Research Corporation, Madison, WI; 2Texas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, TX; 3New Iberia Research Center, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, New Iberia, LA; 4Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, San Diego, CA; 5Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Background: RNAi therapeutic ARC-520 designed to target all cccDNA-derived transcripts reduces viral antigenemia for >1 month after single doses in HBV patients. Here we report the effect of multiple ARC-520 doses on hepatic HBV DNA and RNA in HBV chimps. Methods: 9 chimps (5 M, 4 F; 9-37 yrs) received 6-1 1 monthly injections of ARC-520 concurrent with NUC therapy. 5 were HBeAg-positive (HBeAg+), baseline DNA 8-9 log10 IU/mL serum, and 4 were HBeAg-neg-ative (HBeAg-), < 3 log10 lU/mL. Chimps received NUCs for 8-24 weeks prior to ARC-520 dosing. Liver biopsies from 8 chimps were taken at baseline, completion of NUC lead-in and on study. HBV DNA, + /- plasmid-safe DNase digestion to enrich cccDNA, was measured by qPCR. Pre-core/core RNA (C probe) and total HBV RNA (Total probe) were measured by RT-qPCR. The Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals was strictly adhered to. Results: During NUC lead-in, total liver HBV DNA decreased 1.1-2.5 log10 in HBeAg + but not appreciably in HBeAg- chimps. cccDNA in HBeAg + chimps decreased 0.7 ± 0.6 log10. Following addition of ARC-520 in HBeAg+, total liver DNA decreased from baseline by 1.5–2.9 log10and cccDNA by 1.4 ± 0.7 log10, the degree of reduction generally correlating with duration of treatment. Neither total HBV DNA nor cccDNA levels changed remarkably in HBeAg- during the study, which at baseline had 2-4 orders of magnitude less cccDNA than HBeAg + chimps. HBeAg- chimps had 50-fold more DNase-sensitive HBV DNA, possibly indicating the majority is integrated DNA rather than cccDNA. HBV RNA was not reduced by NUCs, but with addition of ARC-520 RNA reductions tracked qHBsAg reductions. In HBeAg+, Total probe detected 1-2x as many transcripts as the C probe, suggesting similar levels of core/pre-core and S transcripts. In HBeAg-, the Total probe detected 37x more transcripts than the C probe, supporting a greater proportion of HBsAg transcripts being produced from integrated HBV DNA in HBeAg- chimps. Integration between DR1 and DR2 would result in HBV RNA lacking ARC-520 target sites, consistent with greater HBsAg reduction in HBeAg + (1.7 ± 0.5 log10) than HBeAg-chimps (0.7 ± 0.1 log10). Administration of siRNA targeted to integrant-produced transcripts resulted in HBsAg reductions up to 2.3 log10 beyond those produced by ARC-520 in HBeAg-. Conclusions: 1) ARC-520 reduced total liver DNA and cccDNA beyond levels achieved in HBeAg + with NUCs during lead-in; 2) ARC-520 but not NUCs reduced HBV RNA and antigens; 3) integrated HBV DNA may be important in maintaining HBsAg in chronic HBV, especially in HBeAg-. This finding, if confirmed, has important implications for development of new HBV therapies.