dont worry about some crystals in the urine. drink more water and you should be fine.
the mucous has no significance.
the creatinine is more of a problem, you do need the cystatin c to independently test glomerular filtration capacity. Insist on it to be repeated.
Just wanted to share latest results:
HBV DNA IU/mL: < 29 IU/mL HBV DNA Detected
Total Bili: 0.3mg/dL
Dir Bili : < 0.1 mg/dL
Ind Bili : <0.3 mg/dL
AST (SGOT) - 35 (down a few points)
ALT (SGPT) - 53 (down from before, thankfully)
Creatine - 1.26 mg/dL (.02 higher than top end)
Uric Acid - 7.5 mg/dL
Calcium - 9.8 mg/dL
Phosphorus - 3.3 mg/dL
pH - 5.5
CK - 213 U/L (this number jumped up a LOT)
Parathyroid Hormone - 60.4 pg/mL (Again, up a LOT)
I'm concerned about all these and then this comes up with urine test:
CRYSTALS: Ca OX Present
MICELLANEOUS ELEMENTS: MUCOUS
How does one even get mucous in their urine? I am not sexually active so this is a shock to me
But then I see other lab:
CS&GCtrlClr KX 34.2 which is low
Apparently lots of other required testing was "unavailable"
Then I saw this and it alarmed me that this lab could just be wrong:
CYSTATIN C - MISHANDLED BY LAB
I wonder what all happened here? Very odd!!
Anyway, I've generally been feeling pretty decent and such, and am not concerned any more at this point about overanalyzing it all. We'll see what happens in 2 months.
that s a trick so in the trial you can have higher percentages of so called undetectable and put in very small writing below (hidden) und is <29, are they smart?
Sorry I have not been as active, updating more. They are now watching me every 2 months. I got results from my latest DXEA Scan about a month after it happened. Here it is:
Region: Spine L1, BMD: 0.889, BMC: 11.1, Area: 12.51, TScore: -2.3, ZScore: -2.3
Region: Spine L1-L2, BMD: .973, BMC: 25.5, Area: 26.23, TScore: -1.9, ZScore: -1.9
Region: Spine L1-L3, BMD: 1.021, BMC: 41.0, Area: 40.19, TScore: -1.6, ZScore: -1.6
Region: Spine L1-L4, BMD: 1.035, BMC: 57.6, Area: 55.68, TScore: -1.5, ZScore: -1.5
Region: Spine L2, BMD: 1.049, BMC: 14.4, Area: 13.72, TScore: -1.6, ZScore: -1.6
Region: Spine L2-3, BMD: 1.080, BMC: 29.9, Area: 27.68, TScore: -1.3, ZScore: -1.3
Region: Spine L2-4, BMD: 1.077, BMC: 46.5, Area: 43.17, TScore: -1.4, ZScore: -1.4
Region: Spine L3, BMD: 1.110, BMC: 15.5, Area: 13.95, TScore: -1.1, ZScore: -1.1
Region: Spine L3-L4, BMD: 1.090, BMC: 32.1, Area: 29.45, TScore: -1.3, ZScore: -1.3
Region: Spine L4, BMD: 1.071, BMC: 16.6, Area: 15.49, TScore: -1.4, ZScore: -1.4
Spine Total Adequate BMD: 1.035, BMC: 57.6, Area: 55.68, TScore: -1.5, ZScore: -1.5
Region: L.FemurNeck, BMD: 0.929, BMC: 4.7, Area: 5.02, TScore: -1.1, ZScore: -0.8
Region: L.FemurShaft, BMD: 1.145, BMC: 17.6, Area: 15.38, TScore
Region: L.FemurTotal BMD: 0.959, BMC: 31.7, Area: 33.01, TScore: -1.0, ZScore: -0.8
Region: L.FemurTotalAdequate BMD: 0.959, BMC: 31.7 Area: 33.01
Region: L.FemurTrochanter BMD: 0.744, BMC: 9.4, Area: 12.60 TScore: -1.7, ZScore: -1.6
Region: L.FemurWards BMD: 0.749, BMC: 2.1, Area: 2.80 TScore: -1.6, ZScore: -1.3
If I compare this to the other post in this thread, it's clearly obvious there is slow bone density loss going on here. This further makes me believe that I am on the old drug on this trial. Feel free to comment.
Clinical trial.. you'll have to ask Gilead that question! :)
My doctor uses a better test, but they don't use that one on the clinical trial. They use what Gilead tells them to use for Gilead's trial
why they don't use some more sensitive test, I think 29 IU is not the best sensitivity ?