Due to the unpredictable nature of HBV there are no studies or numbers that can answer these questions for you. You can live a perfectly healthy lifestyle and still get liver cancer with HBV. That's the stark reality. I don't think you need to be very well-versed in the biology of cancer to understand the impact that drinking and smoking could have. You're the only one who can decide if the risk is worth it. You're the only one who can know if you'll be at peace with your decisions given the possibilities.
Are you relaxed more if drinking consistently has a higher risk of liver damage than smoking consistently?
Maybe your quest should be for the answer to how to stop hurting your liver intentionally when you know it is trying so hard dealing with HBV and giving you your good life.
So is there a higher risk of liver damage to those who only smoke (consistently) compared to those who only drink (copnsisently)?
Cigarette smoking deliver toxins (carcinogenic ones) to the bloodstream which have to filtered out by, guess who? That's right, me, your liver.
Yr 1-year interferon treatment should help to decrease the VL to a low level and then you continue with the combo which continue to push down the VL to your current level. If you look back, you have been on medication for 1year+ which I think it's normal and you have to continue to monitor your VL to probably UND vs current detectable level. Mono has been very effective in reducing the VL to UND level. Combo will give you extra assurance on the drug resistance......no so much on reducing the VL.
This study "Hepatitis B virus DNA levels at week 4 of lamivudine treatment predict the 5-year ideal response," Yuen MF et al, Hepatology. 2007 Nov 20;46(6):1695-1703 concluded that if your VL can achieve the ideal response [HBV DNA level < 2000 copies/mL (400 IU/mL)] at week 4, then your chance of HBeAg seroconversion, normal alanine aminotransferase levels, and absence of tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartate (YMDD) mutations] at year 5 is best.
Also, part of your combo treatment, lamivudine, is known to be very effective in quickly bring down VL.
Hello,
Actually, Adevifor + Lamuvudine were the only options given to me at that time... In the UK, i don't think entecavir + tenofovir is frequently used....I only recently got a posting in regards to what combo-treatments were the most effective and was gonna mention (ask) my hepitologist the reason why i wasn't put on the latter.... The main question here tho was whether it is normal for one to decrease so much in VL in the spate of a few months....
May I ask the reason for Adevori + Lumuvudine combo treatment? Is it correct entecavir + tenofovir are stronger in potency against resistance?
The faster the suppression of the viral load to UND, the better the prognosis of your treatment. After you have reached UND or <105U/L, you need to monitor regularly your VL. If it stays UND, you are fine; otherwise your doctor needs to consider adding or switching to deal with the resistance.
Glad to see your posting again.