Yup! life is like a box of Chocolates you just don’t know what you're going to get.
jasper
I`m in a foggy period now week14 thats why i even spell bader then i use to .
I´ve learned so much from you people here and I´m very grateful for that, I told my hepdoc flguys, andiamos. and mikeds very interesting storys and so far ( pray that they gonna continue that way) pos. results. He seemed very interested.
But when we come to discus if the liver cells hosting the virus must die, (he brought that up I´ve been having that disc. before with another hcv infected ) that conversation reminded me that I have several times when reading posts here about vl result (und) wondered what test that was used quite some times it was that bad test and I´m an impatient person (cant stand people in the golf-course who take to long time getting of the green putting their bags in wrong spot etc) I´ve got the same feeling about you USA not changing to more precis tests all over. In Sweden we only use that tacman <15iuml nowadays
have to work on that impation bit not easy when on riba though! thx for all the funny remarks
Be well !
PS. Guess "laughing stock is that laughing stock says ( Forest Gump)
I know what you mean, jools .. I'm glad I'm not the only one. There are tons of things I've thought and have NOT posted on this one!!! Gawd, it has felt good to *laugh* today. :)
Well, this has been one wild rawhide day to say the least, we’ve been scattered all over the prairie and off the path under the fresh air and sunshine so its time to round em up and head em home. Enjoy!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_4whtOTalw&feature=related
Comeagain, I hope you have found some information and laughter amongst the dust. BTW how are you doing with the TX?
jasper
I'm glad i am not txing those cold showers would leave me like a prune, lol
Ladies good evening :))
Meki! I'm not allowed to have testes on the brain while on treatment, I don't think, at least not according to trial protocols. They keep telling me that. Along with that whole double-wrapped hazmat-suited teflon-coated thing they keep reminding me of. Sigh. "Here... you just stick that thing into the autoclave before you get any closer" .. kinda ruins the mood, you know?
(Gawd Meki .. quit making it so EASY for me!! I'm trying my darndest to resist saying what's in my brain...argh!!!)
I truly couldn't have made it thru tx this far without you all!!!
ROTFLOL!!!
My interferon/riba/procrit/ambien filled brain is going all over the place with
this one!!!
=)
Jasper --- take Trish out back --- QUICK...
Before she gets any spunkier...
Sigh --- she's got testes on the brain.
ROFLMAO!
jools...when you say "hold the nuts" do you mean "hold" as in no nuts or .. ? ;->
jools!!!! Man, I was afraid to touch that one and it didn’t matter which ice cream I could offer up. ROTFLMAO
jasper
Yep. Spring is in the air!
Make mine a strawberry icecream cone dipped in chocolate(hold the nuts!)
LOL
I love ya all!!!
That would be "HDR" (as in high dose ribavirin) and not "HDV" as written.
You obviously checked later than I did. My "Swedish" check was when I started treating around three years ago. At that time, Lindahl and Company were using a sensitivity of 50 IU/ml in their HDV pilot study, while I was using Heptimax with a sensitivity of 5 IU/ml. As to your "personal experience", previously noted, I'm sure many of us would like for you to expand on that thought :)
-- Jim
Its the HMO's dammit. My HMO's Lab has 2 tests. A tma Qual that is 10 IU. And a PCR QUAN. that is 615 IU. That is it. Their Lab doesn't have any other tests, period.
So we are stuck with what they have,
Bobby
The last time I checked, the most common test in Sweden is HCV RNA Taqman, range 15 IU/ml to 69'000'000 IU/ml. I asked why we are not using even more sensitive tests, and the reply was that when you get down to such a low viral load as 2, 5 or 15 IU/ml, there really is no difference between the tests, they are just as good. It is too difficult to measure exactly at this low a viral load.
As an example, I can mention that I was told by the lab doctor that my borderline test at week 12 (detectable but too low to quantify) equaled anywhere between 5 and 20 IU/ml.
And when it comes to testes and Comeagain, I guess I am the only one on this board who has personal experience of that. :)
Jim
Europe seems to be using Real Time RT-PCR tests nowadays. Both Zazza and Comeagain seem to be using Roches COBAS Taqman PCR Test. So am I for that matter.
Real-Time PCR Assays for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA Quantitation Are Adequate for Clinical Management of Patients with Chronic HCV Infection
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, July 2006, p. 2507–2511 Vol. 44, No. 7 0095-1137/06/$08.00_0 doi:10.1128/JCM.00163-06
The linear range pf these tests is mind blowing
COBAS TaqMan 43-69,000,000
Abbott 12-100,000,000
The assay meets the Second WHO International Standard for HCV RNA. The lower limit of detection is 12 IU/ml, with _95% probability. The dynamic range of the assay extends from 12 to 100,000,000 IU/ml. The Abbott RealTime HCV assay detects and quantitates genotypes 1 to 6.
The LoD of bot are pretty good as well.
Cobas TaqMan HCV (Roche Diagnostics, Meylan, France), with a detection limit of 15 IU/ml (7), and the Abbott Real-Time HCV quantitative assay (Abbott Laboratories, Rungis, France), with a detection limit of 10 IU/ml.
End-point-PCR-based assays (Cobas Monitor and LCx) and the signal amplification assay (Versant; Bayer) should now be called “old-generation HCV RNA quantitation,” as opposed to “new-generation real-time PCR” assays, for at least the following three reasons:
(i) the absence of complete automation,
(ii) the need to dilute for quantification above the upper range (8), and
(iii) the fact that the former assays were standardized with the first WHO panel, and due to the different secondary standards used for calibration, the IUs measured by these assays are different.
In a recent comparative study (11), we demonstrated that the absolute values obtained with these assays are different and that the HCV RNA viral load decline, assessed by different assays during antiviral therapy, can give different results regardless of the use of international units.
The viral loads measured by the Abbott and Roche assays were highly correlated
CS
The problem as I see it, are all the unknowns. If your doctor is as honest as mine, the answer to many questions concerning HepC is; we don't know.
Are these old tests a problem? and to whom? I don't know:)
It's a great day when as Americans we can wake up, test our testes (and those of our congressman), get testy, talk, learn, and laugh about it, and go to the family table for ice cream... with nuts !!
lmao :)
~eureka~
Gives thanks to all (and to God for all) while screaming for ice cream
Jasper, I admire someone who has the guts to speak up about a perceived injustice and it also gave me the opportunity to address it, so no harm done.
Aw shucks.. now we're all one big happy family again... and I want ice cream too!! Maple walnut please Elaine???? :)
Trish
Love you Jasper... You're too cool.
I also apologize for jumping to conclusions of what has been written but there have been times here when something said in jest got so blown out and twisted that there were a lot of hard feelings left in its wake. I guess I was focused on trying to understand what comeagain was saying and because of the language difference, I overlooked the “Testes” part and Trish’s counter reply to that and perceived the reply as lets say unjust given comeagain is somewhat new here. Actually while grocery shopping and thinking back it did seem out of charter for Trish to insinuate any preemptive insults and my apologies to you also, Trish.
Yeah, I know Elaine dog gone it, (head hung, looking at the ground, shoulders slumped, kicking the dirt) I’m sorry all, now can we get an ice cream Elaine… Please!!! LOL!
jasper
As of the last time I checked, the most sensitive test used in Sweden (and the rest of Europe) was 50 IU/ml. At that same time, many of us here were using tests that went down to 5 IU/ml, and some even down to 2 IU/ml. The "600 IU/ml" test you refer to is probably a bDNA, and is quite appropriate for testing viral load *pre-treatment*. During treatment, most knowlegeable hepatologists in this country use the more sensitive tests.
I didn't think anyone was being rude...
And I think comeagain was intentionally trying to be funny as heck.
And it was...
LMAO!
But - even if comeagain wasn't trying to be funny --- LOL - -- it's good to have a joke MAGICALLY appear on the boards...
Thank you for the grin all of you.
Hugs,
Meki
Thank you for that .. and for the additional laughter on the congressman's testes :) What I meant by the "cutoff" date was.. hold old do you suggest American men need to be to make them a candidate for throwing their testes in the garbage. Although...I suppose "cutoff date" could be taken to mean the removal date. :)
Seriously though.. I agree with you on the test sensitivities .. dsrt's comments noted.
I have dealt with that here in Canada to some degree with no VL test having anything higher than a 1.3 mil IU/ml upper limit. Apparently that is about to change.. however I find it frustrating to know that that's where we're AT.
Regards,
Trish
Ty for the apalogize. its accepted I know I come about provokativ with laughing stock but there is some truth in it, and maybee if you refer to your doc that people from a small country
( 9milj) like Sweden, think its odd that you in a big rich country using tests ( not testes this time) that are out of age and missleading aswell, maybee saying that could speed the evelopment up a little bit, or at least give you when saying so a better test bad insurance or not.
btw it was the congessmans testes i was talking about