Willing, again Thank You for the links and the brief explanation of each link and are of a tremendous help to me as to the reverse spin of phase one.
jasper
as far as I can tell, very little is known about the mechanics/kinetics of viral rebound. On the other hand, the effects of soc on the viral population at the start of treatment have been studied in great detail, eg
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10971860
There seems to be some argument about whether viral decline plays out in two or three distinct phases, eg
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17596864
but it seems near-everyone agrees that the first phase, when the ifn first hits and exerts a dramatic suppression on viral reproduction, lasts from 24-48 hous after the 1st shot.
The relapse rebound is obviously much harder to study, but, by extension from the above, once the ifn-suppression is discontinued it would be reasonable to expect something like the reverse of phase one. That is reproduction in the remaining infected cells should be back to business as usual within a couple of days. Given that the number of infected cells at eot is presumably pretty low, getting from there to measurable vl should take a while longer.