I asked my Br. that while on tx. He said that I couldn't reinfect myself with a toothbrush. I did, however, switch them out after the first undetectable pcr. Razor cartridges I changed weekly.
DJL
Go get a dog...
-----------------
Easy for you short-course guys to say. LOL. Try 54 weeks instead of 12 sometime :)
-------------------------------------
Listen, thanks again for your intelligent thoughts, a couple of things...
First, I had weekly PCR's starting at week 1, so I know what week I became non-detec. Second, I'm not sure that your optimism of 1b super-responders is documented. By that I mean, what per cent of 1b's actually have a 4-week PCR? I'd say it is very small. So in other words, the number of 'super responders' may be very understated with many who cleared at week 12, actually clearing earlier.
As I said before, I am positive regarding SVR but reality (various medical opinions) suggest 70-90% plus but with some here suggesting re-treating earlier than later -- a little contingency planning isn't a bad thing -- also takes my mind off of things in a weird way.
I do like you're positive, gung-ho attitude. If I ever find myself in big sh*t trouble in Florida, I'll know who to call. LOL.
-- Jim
No, I'll pass on the 54 week thing, but thanks for asking.
I wouldn't be able to help you in Florida. I live and work in Maine, and I only eat saltwater fish that swim off the George's Bank. Had some Mahi-Mahi (Dorado) once. They said it was a delicacy. Tasted like bluefish to me.
DJL
I think the retreating issue has more to do with how you feel after finishing tx. If you are still feeling pretty strong, not burned out, and then show a quick relapse, in that case I think you could conceivably begin again as early as you liked. I do not know that there is much comparative data out there regarding efficacy of quick retreatment, versus delayed retreatment. None that I am aware of, anyway.
I think you might get more meaningful info. from a 4 week post-tx PCR, than a 2 week test. The one month PCR would give the virus time to reassert itself, if it is still around, and it would probably show up on the ultra sensitive qual. or quant. test. If you are undetected at one month post-tx, I think your odds are very good...probably over 90% or even higher, that you will become SVR.
Stay confident, and try to relax...I think your odds are good, judging from your early response, and having gone almost a full year being undetected. Did you keep your inf. and riba. at the same levels throughout??? I think you are in good shape on this issue, and I am really expecting to see an ongoing set of 'undetected' PCR results over the coming months, and throughout the first year off tx. I think you are probably feeling pretty confident as well, so don't do TOO MUCH homework on retreatment unless your PCR outcome is radically different than expected. Enjoy your initial weeks and months off therapy...it is a wonderful feeling!!!!!
Good luck Jim, we are all pulling for you. I enjoy your input and contributions to the forum. You are ready to be promoted to one of the 'Senior Consulting SVR Alumni Member' roles on this forum. Be prepared to change hats!
DoubleDose
I suggest a 3 year old black standard poodle with no training. He is very affectionate, very adorable, babe magnet. Only eats Moist and Meaty so requires occasional toothbrushing (HCV immune, so you can use your old toothbrush). FREE SHIPPING.
I didn't understand logic of the 2-week post-tx PCR either (he also does a 4-week, 3 month, 6 month, etc) but as always, he leaves it more or less up to me. Basically, I was going to let his whole thing lie for about 3-months, but than Kalio's doctor wanted her to start treating right away and got me thinking if there's a compelling reason to do it or not. The feeling I'm getting, however, is that there's nothing documented in this regard and simply differing opinions. And then there's THIS...
Cuteus posted a study recently about controlled tx interruption. My doc didn't particularly like it for a number of reasons (he likes to rest folks for six months at least ) but I find it sort of fascinating if the data holds behond a cohort of 2. LOL. The thing I like is that it theoretically minimizes drug exposrure. If it works that is. :)
http://tinyurl.com/oryb5
-- Jim