Further to my original post (
http://www.medhelp.org/posts/Hepatitis-C/Positive-RIBA--Indeterminate-Antibody--Negative-PCR-RNA/show/1473632?personal_page_id=2073532#post_6701118), i have taken a 2nd anti-HCV / PCR RNA test. The results were the same as 1 month ago. I wanted to see if by some chance there might have been an error in the first test. I did ask for a RIBA test but i don't believe that the lab here does that test.
So basically my test results are this to date:
- December 20, 2010 - positive for HCV antibodies (RIBA 3.0 test)
- February 19, 2011 - indeterminate for HCV antibodies (anti-HCV test)
- negative PCR RNA (Cobas Amplicor HCV v2.0 Qualitative) Roche Diagnostics System
- March 18, 2011 - indeterminate for HCV antibodies (anti-HCV test)
- negative PCR RNA (Cobas Amplicor HCV v2.0 Qualitative) Roche Diagnostics System
Overall i believe it is good news but some of the results are a bit confusing. If i tested positive for the RIBA test 3 months ago shouldn't the anti-HCV register a positive result by now? Is there any possibility of an error within the RIBA test?
I ask these questions on this theory. If i had the virus and little immune system response i would see enormous numbers in a very short time. This doesn't seem to be happening or the PCR RNA test would be positive. A PCR RNA test might not be picking up the virus because the amount of virus is tiny. But if i had tiny viral numbers then that would mean my immune system was suppressing the virus, and that should register a strong response with the antibody tests. Someone correct me if i'm wrong.
Can anyone suggest if i should be looking to find a lab that can do a RIBA test to see if the original RIBA test was done correctly?
Any info would be greatly appreciated.