Hi Mac, I can't imagine anyone having a problem with your sharing a link to another site. Unless they are selling something. Anyway, I'm curious about which site you're talking about.
Hi there, I think Mac has a good take on it.
You are moving in the right direction when I treated and got to UND <43 was the lowest it would go.
You are doing really well.
Take Care
Dee
Thank you very much for your encouraging words I need to think good thoughts and be patient and hopefully achieve a great outcome of svr . I wish you luck my friend hopefully we will both be clear and have a less stressful Christmas . Take Care .
Simon4271, I am in a Phase III clinical trial, different drugs, but very close in chemical structure/method of action to yours. Merck is making the drug in my trial. I would NOT be concerned about a viral load count of 15, down from 3 million plus. 15 could very well be in the margin of error, depending upon the quality of the testing lab.Your trend is obviously dramatically positive. If I had to bet, week 8 will reveal "no detectable viral particles found", or "ND". I am on a 12 week trial of a combo of two Merck drugs in one pill, very much the same as the combo you are taking. The gold standard that four huge "Big Pharma" have drugs in the pipeline are shooting for is: A 1 pill per day, 12 week long treatment, with no Interferon or Ribavirin ("RBV"), ending with a SVR in 99% of patients, regardless of cirrhosis stage. I am Stage 5/6 cirrhotic, about as bad as you can get. My viral load dropped from 585,000+ to 396 in 7 days. Since then, the lab they send the blood samples out to has managed to bungle both week 4 and 6 viral load tests. No data. I just had week 8's viral load blood drawn today. I won't know anything until my next visit, in early October. If I am not "ND" by then, I most assuredly will not clear the virus. I missed getting the 16 week arm of the study. No amount of asking, pleading or offering animal sacrifices will get them to extend either of us to 16 weeks. We were both chosen randomly by a computer program, I had 4 possible arms: 1) 2 experimental meds for 12 weeks, 2) same for 16 weeks, 3) 2 experimental meds plus RBV for 12 weeks, and finally 4) experimental meds and RBV for 16 weeks. You and I drew the short straw, but that using my assumption that the experimental meds plus RBV was an option for you. I'm certain you are going to be fine ,according to the literature I have read (contact me personally and I'll give you the website address showing the latest clinical trial results). I would mention it here, but got ripped for "pushing" this great informational website on another, completely different forum. (If the administrators here don't mind, I'd be glad to spell out for everyone the URL of this great, free resource). You are I are taking meds on the very cutting edge of antiviral therapy, but in the next few years, I would postulate SVRs in 100% of patients. I can envision a day when you check yourself into a hospital or clinic, they give you an infusion, watch you for a day and release you, with an SVR of ND. That is my guess where the therapy will eventually wind up. I would not worry my friend, I think you've got this beat. I would bet money on it, in fact. Please feel free to contact me, and please keep us all posted. mac790