I think you can put the encounter to rest, not because of your IgM but because it was a low risk encounter. If you want to be most certain, I would recommend an IGG at 3-4 months post encounter.
Best of luck to you. This will be my last post on this thread.
Terri
Terri,
Yes my test came back <.91. Which I believe is negative. I have also read that adults turn over to igg faster. Could that be why test was negative?
Also, I have kissed my wife on the couple of days after and she has shown no symptoms.
Also, I have already stopped treatment on my lip.
Should I be able to put this to rest now?
Terri,
Thank you again so much. So I can but this to rest?
The IgM tests that are suspect are those that are positive, in my experience. Yours was negative, not positive, right?
The bump is probably completely normal and I would recommend that you stop treating it.
I think it is not true that only 20% of people with herpes show symptoms. I would say that a more accurate statement is that only about 20% of people who have herpes, know it. Many others have symptoms, but they don't recognize them as herpes until they are told their diagnosis.
I think you would have recognized symptoms by now, yes.
Terri
Terri,
Sorry one last question. Given It is 13 days past possible exposure, should I have seen signs by now?
Sorry for another question. Thanks you again for all your time and help in this matter. Have a great day.
Terri,
Thank you very much for you reply. Sorry, but I do have a few more questions.
1.) I took a IGM test 8 days after. Everywhere I read, it says that the IGM test is junk and it should be thrown out. Should I trust it in this case?
2.) I do have a small, very tiny white bump on my upper lip, right on the vermillion border. I saw my GP about it and he said it did not look like herpes. However he prescribe Zovirax. I have noticed this bump for 9 days now and been using the cream for 4 and it has done nothing to it. Does that mean it is not viral? Maybe a fordyce spot?
3.) I have read that only 20 % of people actually show symptomatic symptoms. Why do you feel mine should be quite symptomatic?
Thank you again. Sorry I have more questions. I am just curious, plus it may provide excellent information to someone else in this situation.
1) No, your symptoms don't sound anything like a first oral infection in someone who has previously tested negative for HSV 1 and 2. I would expect, if you contracted a new oral herpes infection, that you would be quite symptomatic - blisters, etc. I doubt that there would be any question about whether you had herpes symptoms or not.
2) if, by some freak thing, you did acquire HSV 1 orally and didn't notice it, the only risk to your baby during pregnancy would be if you gave your wife oral sex and transmitted it to your wife genitally.
5) a person is most contagious immediately after acquiring herpes, when there is not yet an immune response to reduce viral sheding.
But again, to me your symptoms don't sound herpetic, and you have negative blood antibody tests to confirm this opinion. Also, the likely of getting oral hsv 1 from MAYBE kissing someone else is really low. I know this is scary, but I think the risk you face is very very low.
Terri