Recurrent, long-lasting herpes outbreaks

[Brookhaven]

Hello,
  
   Earlier this year I developed a red, itchy rash in my pubic hair. The doctor told me it was probably an allergic reaction and put me on cortisteroids, which didn't help much other than bringing the redness down. I was told that it was probably a nickel or cobalt allergy, and given an allergy patch test. However, the test came back negative. At that time I was getting small clusters of lesions that would start off as redness, turn into vesicles, then scab over. The problem was that as soon as one lesion would scab over, another would form. This went on for about two months.
  After the last of the lesions healed, I had about a month and a half with no lesions. However, I did have some mild redness and itching at the same site during this "clear period", but that would come and go.
  After a month and a half with no lesions, they came back in the same place and I went to the doctor again. This time I went to another doctor, who seemed convinced that it was not an allergy, but herpes. I requested that he do a zanck smear. He looked at it under the microscope for at least 10 minutes, and didn't seem very happy with it. He said things like "this is not a very good example of a herpes smear, but I can see some signs that it is herpes". He put me on zovirax. I took the meds, which didn't do much, and I was still not completely convinced about the diagnosis.
  That was about a month ago. The lesions that he saw are almost completely healed, but now new lesions are forming, just like before. If my previous outbreak was any indication, I have at least another month of this to look forward to. I really don't want to go back to the doctor because they all seem to be acting on assumptions and not trying to recognize that my case is not exactly normal for HSV (at least in my opinion).
  My question is this: Is it possible that these lesions take a month to heal, then form new lesions with little or no reprieve, dragging on through two months or more? When I'm "clear" should I still have redness and itching in that area?
  I will admit that these lesions do look like herpes. They itch, they hurt, and they follow all the stages normally associated with HSV. But the severity and duration seems unusual.

Thank you--

[gracefromHHP]

there is no such thing as herpes diet and avoid any websites that still try to tell you that there is.  That theory never held up outside of the test tube.  Why you have ob's has as much to do with genetics as anything else most likely from what we know at this point.  

Unfortunately I can't really help you much with the igg blood test you had done since it's not one of the common ones that are done worldwide ( can tell that by the way it was reported to you ).   I"m not familar with the accuracy of many of the tests done in other countries but I do know that many of them are highly inaccurate :(   I still recommend that if your rash reappears you go and get it cultured just to err on the side of caution to confirm your hsv status.  

grace

[Brookhaven]

Your advice was good, Grace. I got the IGG (not free of charge, though) and my titer was 150-something, which I'm told means that I got herpes sometimes within the last year. That makes sense, considering the "rash" first showed up in February.
I asked about diet, and the doctor told me that avoiding arganine rich foods to avoid flare-ups was just a myth. What do you think about that?

[Brookhaven]

I may do that, but it is not easy since this is not my home country. Foreigners don't really have the same rights as locals.

[gracefromHHP]

don't hesitate to complain to someone at the hospital about paying for tests that should've never been ordered in the first place. They should credit you the pcr blood test and give you the igg test free of charge.

grace

[Brookhaven]

Ok, that makes sense. And damn, that blood test was really expensive too. Looks like the hospital screwed me again.
Maybe if/when this rash comes back I'll go to another hospital and ask for a pcr swab.
Thanks again for taking the time to help me--

[gracefromHHP]

That statement is in regards to using pcr for lesion cultures which is an accurate way to test for herpes when you have active lesions. In fact pcr swabs are so good at picking up on small amounts of herpes that it's the way they do the home swabbing tests for herpes to get the stats we talk about with shedding in between obvious lesions and such.  If you are actively shedding the virus on the skin's surface - pcr has a good chance of picking up on it even if you don't have an obvious lesion present. pcr actually detects herpes dna instead of say regular viral lesion cultures which rely on getting active virus on the swab and then getting it to the lab in a timely manner and being able to make the actual virus grow in the lab ( which is far easier said than done hence the high rate of false negative lesion cultures ).  

With newborns you can oftentime pick up herpes in blood by pcr because in newborns their immune system isn't working yet so the virus is able to cause a systemic viremia so you can oftentimes detect the actual virus in the blood. This is why hospitals do often offer herpes pcr blood tests. The doctor who chose to order a herpes pcr blood test on you did so in error. For adults - only a small percentage of folks even get a systemic viremia with their initial infection and even fewer still get a systemic viremia with recurrences which is why using it for routine herpes testing isn't worthwhile and should be avoided.  A negative pcr blood test for herpes doesn't tell you anything about your herpes status.  

Does that make sense?

grace