Glad to be of help.
Terri
Thanks Terri. You and Dr. HHH have been great resources.
Your HSV 1 positive test could have come from oral infection as a child, even without symptoms, HSV 1 from another partner at some point, many things. Current partner status is not the only factor to consider.
Terri
Even with partner HSV 1 negative?
I would say that you are likely infected with HSV 1 and not with HSV 2, but you need a test to be more certain at 16 weeks. The IgM test is not useful.
Terri
OK, here are the facts to date.
No acyclovir taken, that has not taken place.
-single exposure vaginal and oral hetero sex
-Partner tested positive IgG for HSV 2, negative for HSV 1
-I tested positve for HSV 1 IgG (2.59), neg for HSV 2 IgG on day 16 post exposure
-tested neg. for IgM HSV 1/2 on days 23 and 30 post exposure
-developed perianal rash with no vesicles day 30 post exposure, dr. said rash did not look like herpes, treated with fluconazole due to prolonged ab therapy for another problem
-tested positive for HSV 1 IgG (2.6), neg for HSV 2 on day 34 post exposure
I know the "gold standard" is to re-test fo HSV 1 / 2 IgG at 12 -16 weeks.
How would you inerpret my data to this point?
I'm not sure what your doctor is going to do at this point, it is a bit late in the process, especially since you've already taken acyclovir. Any results from cultures or PCRs that are negative are potentially impacted by the medicine.
The lack of vesicles suggests lack of infection but this is not certain.
Terri
One other thought, what about the lack of vesicles? Could they be coming later with a herpes rash. Everything I have read lists them as one of the distinguishing characters of an outbreak.
Yeah, I'm supposed to see my Dr. tomorrow. Still hoping there might be an easy solution.
1) Isn't 30 days a bit far out for symptoms to begin.
Yes, the average amount of time from infection to outbreak is 5.5 days.
2) Is it possible to have a primary out break involving the anus when NO anal sex (oral or otherwise) took place.
That would be very unusual, yes. Very.
3) Any possibility of rash from yeast or fungal overgrowth due to antibiotics.
Definitely, and that would have been my first thought about the cause of this rash.
4) What next?
I think you should go in and have the rash evaluated by a clinician, rather than trying to sort this out yourself. An easy answer might be readily available!
Terri
Day two. Still no overt blisters. Redness somewhat diminished but may be wishful thinking.
The real delimma.........telling my wife about the episode. On the one hand I don't want to say anything if it is not herpes. On the other I don't want to expose her if it is (she has not been exposed so far).