But not in terms of money. It was my checkup neuro appointment at Hopkins.
I was scheduled to see the nurse practitioner, which was fine with me, since she's in the neurology clinic every day, whereas my regular neuro sees patients only one day a week (a standard practice there, where research is king). So getting a prompt appointment with him is pretty much impossible.
The nurse, it turned out, has been at Hopkins only since January, apparently lured away from another MS clinic by a doctor who had worked there with her. However, she has been an MS nurse since 1988, she told me. She was so nice! And so knowledgeable!
She apologized profusely for having me wait an hour past the scheduled time, but I knew what was happening because the reception clerk checked 3 times for me, and was super-kind and helpful. That's a rarity at Hopkins, which is huge and impersonal for the most part. Anyway, the nurse talked to me and asked loads of questions, took careful notes, and did a thorough neuro exam.
I told her I'd been having trouble with my right leg, specifically in lifting it from certain positions. I said I was concerned because it seemed to be slowly getting worse. When she did her testing on that, I asked what rating she was giving my hip flexor strength. She said 3 out of 5, which is significantly worse than last time. Then she asked if I'd been having trouble with my right arm. At first I said no, then mentioned that it sometimes bothers me when driving, sort of an achey feeling. It had never crossed my mind that that was related to MS. My car is only a few months old, and I thought that somehow the steering wheel was 'different.' However, she was clear that she thinks it is weakness. So she ordered not only a new brain MRI, but also cervical spine, thinking the right side weakness might orginate there.
I also told her that other long-standing symptoms had greatly lessened in recent months, but that I continued to suffer from fatigue, plus the relatively new heat regulation problem, sweating when others are quite comfortable, etc. I added that urine retention symptoms were much better but that I suffered from occasional extreme urge incontinence.
I had brought with me the films from my very first brain MRI, in March 2000. I had taken all the other zillion MRI stuff to other Hopkins appointments, but the earliest I had had was from 2003. I had wanted my neuro to take a look at the earliest one, because there was a lot less to see, but still abnormalities in the ventricular area. Well, just before I was seen by the nurse, my neuro left to go to a meeting. The nurse said he would return, and asked if I would wait. But instead of sending me back into the waiting area, she kept me in her examination room, repeated a few tests, and discussed lots of things in detail. So I was with her nearly 2 hours!
She had one of the fellows look at the 2000 one, and compare it with the 2009 MRI. She seems awfully good at this herself, and showed me lots of stuff I didn't know how to interpret. Still, we waited till Dr. X came back. Luckily, the patient after me was a no-show, so she had ample time. Finally Dr. X returned and she and he conferred.
Then he came in to see me. I am not clear on what he meant, but he said that he had looked at the MRIs, and that he found brain atrophy. I'm assuming this was from the one last year, since it was hardly likely to have shown up 10 years ago, or so I'm thinking. So why he didn't say this last year I don't know. I was sure he was going to attribute this to my relatively ancient age, but he didn't. Instead he said atrophy is not uncommon in MS patients (which I knew, but I thought this happened in the later stages). However, I didn't say that.
He went on to say that he was designing a new research study, involving MS patients with brain atrophy. He plans to take skin samples from them and attempt to use these to grow neurons. How interesting. I'll be contacted soon about participating. This won't help my case, of course, but down the road it could help others.
Finally, he told me he was concerned about what he called 'the one breakkdown' I am having, meaning the leg weakness. (I guess, in fact I know ,that reported symptoms such as fatigue or temp. regulation don't carry a lot of weight, but measurable changes certainly got his attention.) He said he didn't see a reason not to continue Avonex at this time. It never crossed my mind that he would, as I know the DMDs are not perfect.
The nurse ordered blood work, and one vial was drawn. She wanted to make sure my kidneys are fine, I'm sure because in rare cases, kidney problems and contrast dye don't mix. She also ordered another Vit. D check. Fine with me.
I now have a script for PT, and I'm being sent to a different place, where she knows that neurological issues will be addressed. Also more Provigil, and Inderal (propanolol) for my essential tremor.
This was by far the best neuro experience of my life. I hope she'll manage things for me permanently. NPs don't get involved in initial assessment and diagnosis, but do handle the 'living with MS' aspect. She's just great! Even though I was told my brain is shrinking :-( I have more confidence now in the whole system. So life is good.
ess