I am a 25 year old female who was seen by a neurologist for the first time today. I had been researching MS because of a lot of the symptoms that I have been having for a while, but really started to bother me here the past few months again. The doctor didn't mention what he thought might be wrong or what he was really ruling out with the tests, but I know that they use the MRI with and without contrast to help diagnose MS, so basically all I want to know is what is that like? I have had numerous MRI's that are just normal, I guess that is what it is like without the contrast. But if I have it with and without, then do I go in and have the first MRI just normal, and then they hook me up to an IV or however they do the contrast dye stuff, and then put me back in the MRI machine to do it again? I just want to know what exactly to expect. To me, this sounds like the only way to do it unless it is two different sessions.
I had a nerve conduction study and EMG on my right arm in January, and it came back completely normal. Then I had an MRI in January by my orthopedic doctor, because he thought I might have a herniated disc, but there wasn't anything wrong according to the MRI either. So I took this MRI to the neurologist today, hoping maybe it would help, but he said something like, it was good for looking for the herniated discs and skeletomuscle problems, but not good enough for what he was looking for like a spinal cord lesion or something. He seemed concerned but said he couldn't see much on the MRI because the pixels weren't small enough or something. So he just decided to order an MRI of my brain. Then after that, he decided to order some blood work with it.
Anyway, sorry for the rambling, and I look forward to hearing from someone on here soon. Thanks!
Helen