My neurologist called me and said the LP wasn't necessary for now so i am happy for it to be postponed for a while as i was dreading it.I have to go in and see her though to discuss new symptoms.Not for a couple of months so waiting game again!
Suzie.
I was told one minute by my neuro that I COULD have an LP. Then when i said to him well your the boss if you want me to i will, to be told, no it isnt necessary as even if you have one the treatment wont change.
Make of that what you will. Subsequently been told I am being treated as THOUGH I have MS and that will do for me. I get everything I need so a label wont change anything for me apparently. Mariax
Thanks for your posts.Kind of wanted to hear it wasn't necessary but if it is i will just have to do it.Really not looking forward to it.
Other tests i have had are MRI,lesions found, blood tests,normal and VEP normal.I have a lymes test the same day as the next LP.
Suzie.
You don't have to have an LP to be DX with MS but..if you need evidence to meet the criteria sometimes an LP is what will do it along with other test. What test have you had so far? Jensequitur is right that most neuros won't DX based on symptoms and MRI. You have to have other abnormal test results as well to confirm the DX.
I had a bad experience too with my LP and I wouldn't want to do it again but if it would give me a DX..I would. Maybe they can give you a sedative before hand. It might help.
Take Care
It's possible to get a diagnosis without the LP, but it's rare to find a doctor that will diagnose you based upon MRI and symptoms alone. I would recommend getting the lumbar puncture - if your symptoms are active, it sounds like you might be developing MS.