Hi, My 69 year old Dad has stage 4 Lung nsc cancer that he has been battling for over 2 years with good results from first Tarceva, then Chemo and prior to that radiation to mets to his brain. He is an otherwise healthy, robust, nonsmoking person. Last month he started experiencing problems walking, nausea and headaches. He was referred to a Neurologist who recommended a Shunt to help regulate the fluid in his brain. It has been a nightmare ever since. Infection after infection back in and out of the hospital due to Bacterial infections he got either during or after surgery. The Neurologists assistant refers to a possible non optimal working shunt - Antibiotics were given while he was in the hospital but not when he went home. Within 7 days he was back in ER convulsing, 103 temp and I thought he was dying-I stayed in the hospital with him for days thinking it was the end. ... 24 - 36 hours of antibiotics, he is comfortable, watching golf on television and knows every golfers name. So on & on it goes. It seems they are testing the fluids from his shunt daily - which does not seem that sanitary either. Its just so awful to see my Dad getting his *** kicked by bacteria from this stupid shunt. So here is my question...The Doctor at the Hospital in Los Angeles CA now say we have 3 options : 1) Take him home to die of infection instead of cancer 2) Remove Shunt entirely and replace it. 3) Option 2 plus do chemo through his spine to help kill any remaining bacteria. I am not a fan of this facility so would be open to other suggestions for a 2nd opinion. Unfortunately he is in the hospital now so it would be a big deal to switch but if it would give us better options and care-we will. I don't know a lot but his WBC is 3 today - and was as high as 17 when he was acute at ER check in. He has great insurance and medicare too-My poor Mom doesn't know what to do...What do you think?