Misguided Massage

[rwda]

I went for a "tantric massage" in Europe.  I had assumed that this meant a "full release" massage.  However, the woman masseuse removed her clothes and proceeded to give me a full body-to-body massage.  It was fine until I rolled over.  At that point, she sat astride me and slithered up and down my body.  There was a lot of oil and definitately genital to genital contact (ie, she started rubbing her vagina up and down the shaft of my penis).  I stopped it rather quickly -- but perhaps not quickly enough.  So the question:  what are the chances that genital apposition with the assistance of a large dose of baby oil could result in STDs generally and HIV specifically?

[garybary]

There was no penetration then?

So regarding incurables:

ZERO risk for HIV.

Low risk for herpes.
Herpes is high-risk only when sores are present, and it would've been so painful for her I doubt she'd be rubbing anything with anything of hers that has a sore.

You'd be incredibly unlucky if she was shedding viruses without sores at the time (low chance).

Considering she even had it (very low chance, as massage therapists are required regular STD tests, even erotic "therapists", as long as she belonged to an establishment, and wasn't a freelance).

Regarding curables:
Gonorrhea, chlamydia, etc: no risk, don't even bother.

No need to be paranoid. Just to give you some perspective, mutual masturbation is virtually zero risk, and even oral sex is very very low risk (zero risk for HIV). You barely crossed either line.

[rwda]

Thanks.  What is "low risk"?  Don't worry about it?  Or get my butt to a doctor for testing?  Sorry if I sound paranoid -- I am.

[kdaily]

if there was no direct penetration then you were at a low risk for HSV, Syphilis and hpv. if there was penetration then you can add chlamydia, gono and HIV to that list and that would be a high risk