Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum. ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
Dear Cooky, The estrogenHormone replacement therapy receptor status gives gives indications as to whether the tumor had receptors that made it sensitive to estrogenHormone replacement therapy in the body to encourage it to grow. If the receptors are positive then hormone therapy to decrease estrogenHormone replacement therapy in the body is an option to treat the cancer. If the receptors are negative this just indicates hormone therapy may not be effectiveEffective strength cough syrup so cancer is treated using other methods such as chemotherapy. There are chemotherapy drugs available to treat estrogen negative breast cancer.
My mom-in-law (73 years) underwent mastectomy a month & half back. Her ER/PR tests were negative. Chemotherapy (epirubrin + cyclophosphamide) was adviced. A second opinion is to forego chemotherapy (due to her age) altogether and go for tamoxifen treatment for the required duration. We're still debating and discussing the options. To help us make an informed decision we'd like inputs from all with respect to (a) relative merits / demerits (in terms of efficacy, short/long term side-effects etc) of the two treatment regimens suggested, (b) quality of life with the two treatments and (c) her longevity.
We may have to decide fast one way or the other. I, therefore, request an early response. Would be much obliged.
My mom-in-law (73 years) underwent mastectomy a month & half back. Her ER/PR tests were negative. Chemotherapy (epirubrin + cyclophosphamide) was adviced. A second opinion is to forego chemotherapy (due to her age) altogether and go for tamoxifen treatment for the required duration. We're still debating and discussing the options. To help us make an informed decision we'd like inputs from all with respect to (a) relative merits / demerits (in terms of efficacy, short/long term side-effects etc) of the two treatment regimens suggested, (b) quality of life with the two treatments and (c) her longevity.
We may have to decide fast one way or the other. I, therefore, request an early response. Would be much obliged.