The nurse only answers the original question. I'm guessing maybe they were unable to get as much of the calcifications as they felt was necessary. Or, it's possible they want to remove the entire area of calcifications with excisional biopsy. If that's the case, I would try to get a second opinion. If the biopsied area was well represented in the mammotome samples, and was benign why do they need to take the entire area? I hope you're able to talk to the doctor soon to have this explained to you.
I had a Mammotome (sp?) on Tuesday for microcalcifications in my right breast. Called for results on Friday afternoon and was told by the nurse that my biopsy was benign but that the doctor wanted me to have additional surgery. He was not available to speak to me. I was thankful for the benign result but its now Saturday night and I can't help wondering what kind of surgery and why? I'm confused. Can you give me any information at all? Thanks.
Thank You, I meet with my surgeon this Thursday. I will be sure to ask him. Are there any other questions that I may need to ask him before the findings of the biopsy? I know that is a funny question concidering I don't know what this is yet, but should I be prepared for the worst and have my ducks in a row? Or am I over analysing?
Thank you for your response and the time you spend helping people in a scary situation.
Dear Jennwfhmom: Whether to have a core biopsy or excisional biopsy depends upon the situation. If there is any concern that the tissue contained in a needle may not be representative of the whole, then an excision biopsy may be recommended. Whether or not there will be any disfigurement will depend upon the size of the abnormality, the amount of breast tissue an individual has, the amount that will be removed and the skill of the surgeon. You would benefit from a discussion with a surgeon as to which approach may be the best in your case.