My best friend had a false negative mammogram 4 years before she passed away. Two years later she was dx Stage IV . Her onc obviously knew that, at Stage IV (mets to the lung)she was terminal but she had every treatment imaginable for the next
2 years anyway. The first year of treatment seemed to be easy;
the second year was disastrous: her port was constantly infected but they could not find any veins in her arm, she developed some disease from treatment where her entire head and face swelled,
a staph infection, mets to the bones, spine then brain...constant hospitalizations then Hospice care.
Why did the onc insist on a mastectomy after her dx? She cried over this but thought it was life-saving. Months after her mast.
she asked her onc if she could be cured and he said "no." Is this behavior by the medical establishment a Law, a way to keep your job, mandatory to satisfy their health insurance company or what is the motive here? Seems inhumane IMO.