Our younger cat was very wild when he was little. We had to break his spirit a little to get him to calm down. He also chewed on his tail and tried to chew out his stitches. We put an E-collar on him and that tamed him. Bungle wouldn't be able to abuse Spunky if he was wearing an E-collar. That way neither one of them would be locked up but Bungle would be getting an appropriate punishment that will most likely break his bad behavior.
No, no, not at all. I was just trying to clarify my original comment about crating. Some people see crating as only a negative thing, I was just trying to offer up some ways in which it can be beneficial. There is no single right or wrong answer when it come to cat behavior. The original poster could crate either cat or both when they are home alone and then go with whatever works best.
I suggested the older cat since he is older and arthritic and has vision problems. Having a crate as a sanctuary might be enjoyable for him to relax in without fear of being beat up. They younger, wild child is more likely to see it as punishment and behave even more obnoxiously when he is out of the crate as a reaction to being punished. The younger cat also has a greater need for physical exercise.
Hi Nancy, so sorry if I came across as "attacking". That was soooo not intended at all. I did agree w/ both you and Opus, but I do honestly think that the obnoxious younger kitty should be the one kept in a crate, and not the older one.
I feel bad that my post came across wrong!! = (
No hard feelings?......I hope!
ZQ
Crating either cat obviously would solve the immediate problem. However, I wasn't suggesting a crate for either cat as a form of punishment, but rather security. Many cats, especially older ones, feel more secure and comfortable in an area of their own that they quickly come to understand is a safe haven from the stress they may feel being exposed to other animals and even humans.
In this particular case, and assuming both cats remain in the household, the older cat is the one that would benefit more, both physically and behaviorally, from having a crate available for those times when his protectors are not available to protect him.
I totally agree w/ both posters!!! I think it would be terrible to rehome Spunky. That stress alone could possibly kill him! And, he's been your cat for 17 yrs.....doesn't he deserve some loyalty?
I wouldn't put poor Spunky in a crate, I would put Bungle in a crate. It's more Spunky's house, than it is Bungles!
I agree poor old spunky its been
her home' all these years and NOT FAIR to turn her out to any new home now when shes old and ill!!
since its bungle causing all the stress and even difficulties d/t your pregnancy its only right that you find some arrangements for him!!
please don't continue to subject poor spunky to this abuse it will severely injure or kill her soon.
Get a crate for Spunky to stay in while you are not at home. Rehoming a 17 year old cat is going to be difficult.
I think the jury may still be out on Bungle. His behavior sound pretty typical for a young cat and that he doesn't realize that Spunky can no longer keep up with his rough play is not necessaily and indicated that he would attack another cat or child. He is in part mimicking what he understands as rough play coming from you (hitting him, chasing after him with a wooden spoon, etc.). and may simply not realize that his behavior is unacceptable.
However, given your concerns, now and in the future, I think rehoming Bungle makes more sense than rehoming Spunky.