Question for Dr. Hagan, a while back you suggested that if someone asked your opinion as to replacement lens, you would suggest mono focal lenses with monocular vision. My question for you is as follows:
Eliminating the extra cost of the H.D.
Crystalen lens from the selection criteria, what is your personal advice to a 50 year old high myope with grade II cataracts. O.D. -10.5 O.S. -14.5. Assume cost is not a factor. A professional who will accept having to use reading glasses to read, if he can drive a car without glasses. Obviously, being able to read without reading glasses would be nice but not necessary.
Second, based on your annedotal data, how do the risks of the H.D. Crystalen lense compare to the risks associated with monofocal implants. ie any higher rates of retinal detachment? Higher rate of needing a YAG? Higher rate of needing lasix?
This information, based on your opinion and experience as of March 2010 would be extremely valued by me and perhaps others considering lens implants.
Everyone is different. IF you want the best quality vision, especially night vision and don't mind glasses then aspheric monofocal is the best available. You can chose minimonovision with either a distance or near bias.
The studies done by me and Dr. Kutryb on these forums indicate that a multifocal IOL like Crystalens was 23 times more likely to lead to a complaint on this forum than a monofocal. Yag risk about same. lasik much higher.
Date on RD is not available but the risks should be the same. That is a significant risk as the highest RD risk is highly myopic early middle age male. It may be as high as 2-3%.
Thanks doctor. I did read your December of 2009 study and thank you for the same. If I am understanding you correctly (while folks may differ) it appears that you would still recommend monofocals with reading glasses over the current Crystalen H.D. for most high myopes that need cataract surgery even without considering the cost. Risks of rd and need for YAG about the same but a larger chance for the need of lasik post surgery with the premium lense to improve refraction.
I appreciate your time. I just wondered whether 2010 experience (perhaps outside the forum) was becoming more favorable to the Crystalen HD..
There are many patients that are very happy with Crystalens HD. They have just come out with a aspheric optic Cyrstalens which should be even better.
We have a surgeon in our practice that does like 75% Crystalens and has about 95% satisfied patients.
It takes very special expertise to achieve that type of "happy" factor. Superlative surgeon, meticulous technique, careful choosing of patients, setting realistic expecatitons and having total corneal/refractive skills so that LRI, lasik, PRK, IOL exchange, etc are part of the surgeons expertise.
There are a number of ophthalmologists that have had Crystalens put in their eyes.
aspheric lens optics are the new thing. Optical tests have shown they improve visual parameters like contrast sensitivity and reduce glare. Yes its been tested and is an improvement over the sphrical optic.
Thanks. How long have private facilities been implanting the new aspheric optic Cyrstalens?
If it truly does reduce the number of reported problems with the HD Crystalens, might that change your recommendation for monofocal lenses with monovision for most patients where cost is not a factor? Or is it just too early to tell?
Thanks in advance. I have to feel this is a really important topic for this board given the previous threads.
Thanks for your time, Doctor Hagan. I truly do appreciate the professional courtesy you have extended. By way of correction, I assume your above post meant the Crystalens AO was just released as the HD was released in 2008. I have read all of the other threads. Unfortunately, with the only access to FDA records being through the Freedom of Information Act and then the selection criteria being limited to the best candidates, the data is less useful than anecdotal experience. There are relatively few posts regarding results in 2010 with the H.D. and only Dr. O concerning the AO. The B & L press release for the A.O. While encouraging, physician and patient experience is preferable.
If any 2010 Users of either lens would add their experience it would be much appreciated.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. Med Help International, Inc. is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.