Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum. ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
Upon colonoscopy to remove the polyp that was found during the CT Scan - the surgeon found another
"submucosal thickening/polyp (?)" (that is how it is written on his report.
Now he wants to talk to the radiologist who read the orginal CT Scan - and have him look again to see if
this "submucosal thickening/polyp (?)" is showing on the CT Scan - and if so, what it looks like (???)
Does this mean I have cancer?
I've looked up "submucosal thickening/polyp on Google and nearly every entry points in that direction.
If its cancer - does the fact that its 'submucosal' mean it is advanced?
It does not mean that you have cancer. There are also polyps that sessile - do not have a stemStem cell research or stalk (peduncle) - and may need to be watched or removed in another manner.
I forgot to mention that the orginal polyp that DID show on the CT Scan, (the one he went in to remove with the colonoscopy) was PRE-cancerous. The surgeon seemed to think that once it was gone (which he says he is confident it is) - the cancer risk is also gone - from that particular polyp, anyway. Although, he said there is a small chance the polyp would regrow. Don't know if that means it would re-grow in a pre-cancerous condition (since it was in that state when it was removed), or not.
Since that one was PRE-cancerous - its made me afraid of this submucosal one ...
So, the submucosal one - would be a sessile polyp then? How are they usually removed, do you know?
Thank you for taking the time to respond, I so appreciate it!
I forgot to mention that the orginal polyp that DID show on the CT Scan, (the one he went in to remove with the colonoscopy) was PRE-cancerous. The surgeon seemed to think that once it was gone (which he says he is confident it is) - the cancer risk is also gone - from that particular polyp, anyway. Although, he said there is a small chance the polyp would regrow. Don't know if that means it would re-grow in a pre-cancerous condition (since it was in that state when it was removed), or not.
Since that one was PRE-cancerous - its made me afraid of this submucosal one ...
So, the submucosal one - would be a sessile polyp then? How are they usually removed, do you know?
Thank you for taking the time to respond, I so appreciate it!