LASIK Surgery Health Chat: Tuesday, December 15th 5:00-6:00 PM Eastern. Free live Q&A with Dr. Omar E Awad. Ask your question in advance!
Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
 | 

Submucosal thickening (polyp?) ?

by alchemyst, Feb 19, 2009 09:51AM
Due to a strong family history of colo-rectal cancers, I recently had a CT Scan done of the large bowel/colon, which showed a polyp in the rectal area.

Upon colonoscopy to remove the polyp that was found during the CT Scan - the surgeon found another
"submucosal thickening/polyp (?)" (that is how it is written on his report.

Now he wants to talk to the radiologist who read the orginal CT Scan - and have him look again to see if
this "submucosal thickening/polyp (?)" is showing on the CT Scan - and if so, what it looks like (???)

Does this mean I have cancer?

I've looked up "submucosal thickening/polyp on Google and nearly every entry points in that direction.

If its cancer - does the fact that its 'submucosal' mean it is advanced?

Please help?

Member Comments (2)

by CalGal, Feb 19, 2009 09:57AM
It does not mean that you have cancer. There are also polyps that sessile - do not have a stem or stalk (peduncle) - and may need to be watched or removed in another manner.

by alchemyst, Feb 19, 2009 10:08AM
Thank you for responding ...

I forgot to mention that the orginal polyp that DID show on the CT Scan, (the one he went in to remove with the colonoscopy) was PRE-cancerous.  The surgeon seemed to think that once it was gone (which he says he is confident it is) - the cancer risk is also gone - from that particular polyp, anyway.  Although, he said there is a small chance the polyp would regrow.  Don't know if that means it would re-grow in a pre-cancerous condition (since it was in that state when it was removed), or not.

Since that one was PRE-cancerous - its made me afraid of this submucosal one ...

So, the submucosal one - would be a sessile polyp then?  How are they usually removed, do you know?

Thank you for taking the time to respond, I so appreciate it!
Related discussions
Post Comment
To
Comment
Post Comment
Recent Activity
Sunkissed19 commented on photo
35 mins ago
TrudieC commented on 33 week OB appointmen...
1 hr ago
Skippys commented on Silly Songs With Larr...
2 hrs ago
April2 commented on Silly Songs With Larr...
3 hrs ago
peggy64 commented on new labs
4 hrs ago
kellie2003 commented on photo
4 hrs ago
Fluffysmom officially signed up NMSS as having MS, getting info on...
Sunkissed19 is halfway done!! 20 more weeks and we'll have a baby!...
RSS Expert Activity
Simple tool to Assess your Risk for...
8 hrs ago by Lee Kirksey, MD
Premium IOLs have a disproportionat...
22 hrs ago by John C Hagan III, MD, FACS
EyeNet Article about MedHelp.com Ey...
Dec 13 by John C Hagan III, MD, FACS
Community Members