I opened a thread a little while ago about my having intercourse with a black man of unknown status. I was very drunk so I dont remember much, but most likely he didn't use protection. I live in Norway and the man had a Spanish accent so I doubt he's from Africa, maybe one of the Spanish-speaking islands surrounding it.
Anyways, almost 4 weeks have passed since the intercourse. Since it was not voluntary (it wasn't rape in the traditional sense but I was too drunk to be able to say no), I was taken care of by a sort of "department for sexual abuse" at the hospital, and they have a policy of testing for HIV at three weeks after intercourse and then again after three months.
The test at three weeks turned out negative (as did tests for pregnancy, syphilis, gonorrhea, hepatitis, chlamydia...basically everything they tested me for). But I know the test is inconclusive so I'm wondering why they would chose to test at three weeks after intercourse and not later?
They know of my circumstances there and have classified my case as "low-risk" when it comes to HIV-infections, but I'm still paranoid and nervous.
Should I follow their advice and just test myself again in three months, or should I go somewhere else and get tested in the meanwhile?
I should note that I to this date, almost a month after the intercourse, have felt absolutely none of the flu-like symptoms that many HIV-patients have described, but perhaps it's a little early on for such symptoms? The only thing that sort of bothers me is that my tongue appears to be a little white...but for all I know it could just normally be like that, I haven't looked at it before (and this time I looked specifically at that, since I had read that a white tongue could be indicative of HIV).
Am i irrational in being as scared as I am for HIV in this case? Should I get tested yet again some other place before the new obligatory test they will give me at the hospital in three months?