Name the other states and name the test that is approved to give you a conclusive test result at 6 weeks.
I've heard this too and I believe that is WRONG.
All the articles that talk about persistently seronegative HIV+ people are in fact dealing with people who have seroREVERTED due to AIDS - this does happen sometimes. That's my take on that issue.
You also may want to check the thread called "Massachussetts" for more on this.
By the way, a number of state health departments consider a 6 week test conclusive including the State of Masachussets. The CDC is not the be all and end all and is overly cautious and conservative.
Hi,
I read an article by med professional which states that very handful of people will not develop detectable antibodies at all eventhough they are infected. In that article, the med prof said the use of viral load assay will be to identify the infection. But I have a question how a person will know that he or she is HIV infected if he or she will be antibody negative on the test. This is strange.
2) People who take longer than 6 months are immunocompressed like chemo, transplant etc. Are there any hidden immune diseases which a person will not know by staying healthy. This is true that immune disorders can delay seroconversion even by 1-2 years because there are datas where people seroconverted after 2 years.
EXPERTS Plz omment.
Thanks
inadepression can and will. he just stirs up the pot. ex his last post (lets continue). what a dumba$$.
i think that you guys are totally just trying to look for any little imperfection. You guys arent understanding the sentence. Yeah it says 97% by 3 months and the other 3% percent are people with the severe immunue problems or whatever. Everyone already knows that if you are indeed positive then your gonna test postive way before 3 months anyway so if you get a negative at 3 then thats it. you dont need anymore. You cant argue with facts.