Thanks a lot for that piece of advice.
I do'nt want to shy away from facts. I will definitly be doing test at 3 months and 6 months before I conclude me negative. It is just get a better hope i asked the question after my 7 week test. I just wanted to know whether it is a good hint or just not atall a hint and will have to wait till 3 weeks to get some clarity .
Thanks a lot once again. your advice soothens me a lot. I will be updating my test results here so that atleast i will be a sample of information for others who are going through the same mental trauma.
All you guys are doing a great job here be helping each other.
Curious, while Teak says 12 to 13 weeks, as well as other people, Dr. HHH says 6 weeks is conclusive. So you really can only get different opinions from this forum. Considering every website that talks about this issues says 3 months, thats what I would go with. However, my medical doctor and Dr. HHH as well as other people in this forum believe 6 weeks is very accurate. So that negative result you had at about 7 weeks should be very reassuring and you probably shouldnt worry anymore. Just test at 13 weeks again to be absolutely sure. According to Dr. HHH, its hard for a man to get HIV from unprotected vaginal sex with a woman who IS HIV positive. I think its something like 1 in 2000 for 1st time exposure. Whether its true or not, its giving me a lot of hope. And I also had SO MANY symptoms after my exposure to, and I am now convinced im negative after I was convinced I was positive. Also so many other people on here complain about symptoms and they never end up having HIV. Hopefully this makes you feel better.
Yes i would be definitly testing at this time. But many of the threads were commenting that a negative result after 6 weeks are encouraging and giving more probabilty for not getting infected. So i just wanted to check with my kind of exposure can i also count an some more chance of not getting infected.
From you comment Teak can i conclude that this test was no indication and just a blunt as any early test. So i still have the same amount of risk as i was having till i get a negative on 13th week ?
Yes i would be definitly testing at this time. But many of the threads were commenting that a negative result after 6 weeks are encouraging and giving more probabilty for not getting infected. So i just wanted to check with my kind of exposure can i also count an some more chance of not getting infected.
From you comment Teak can i conclude that this test was indication and just a blunt as any early test. So i still have the same amount of risk as i was having till i get a negative on 13th week ?
If you would have read their sheet it states, that the test my not pick up early exposure. You need to test at 12/13 weeks.
Can someone answer me.. please