Aa
Aa
A
A
A
Close
Avatar universal

HIV RISK

I performed oral sex on a guy and he came in my mouth. I am so freakin scared about possible HIV risk. I went today for a DNA by PCR to calm my fears. I have done a bit of research and there seems to be data out there to suggest oral does carry a risk. Can others comment to this?
10 Responses
Sort by: Helpful Oldest Newest
Avatar universal
No, the blisters do not increase your risk.
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal
Hello every one, i just had the same problem of above, but i have a litle blister wich is not bleeding.. does that increase the risk? beeing realistic i know that chances of getting hiv are super low.. but there is still a risk caused because of the blister or the salive protects everything??? thank u :)
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal
Saliva contains over a dozen different enzymes and proteins that inhibit HIV transmission.
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal
Thanks for your comment. The science does not support abosbtion via the stomach rather the lining in the mouth. I spit the semen out so my concern is transmission via the tissue in the mouth of course.
Helpful - 0
188761 tn?1584567620
COMMUNITY LEADER
Plus, practically consumption of semen is not the right mechanism of HIV contraction. The gastric acid in your stomach will inhibit the virus.  Please go through the references teak has provided, it certainly keeps no speculations alive that oral is a risk.
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal
Well you can't argue, the CDC was involved in one of the above studies.
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal

The CDC seems to disagree with the above. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/factsheets/pdf/oralsex.pdf
Check out the link above. Not trying to argue but rather why the difference in data?
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal
No incident HIV infections among MSM who practice exclusively oral sex.
Int Conf AIDS 2004 Jul 11-16; 15:(abstract no. WePpC2072)??Balls JE, Evans JL, Dilley J, Osmond D, Shiboski S, Shiboski C, Klausner J, McFarland W, Greenspan D, Page-Shafer K?University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States

Oral transmission of HIV, reality or fiction? An update
J Campo1, MA Perea1, J del Romero2, J Cano1, V Hernando2, A Bascones1
Oral Diseases (2006) 12, 219–228

AIDS: Volume 16(17) 22 November 2002 pp 2350-2352
Risk of HIV infection attributable to oral sex among men who have sex with men and in the population of men who have sex with men

Page-Shafer, Kimberlya,b; Shiboski, Caroline Hb; Osmond, Dennis Hc; Dilley, Jamesd; McFarland, Willie; Shiboski, Steve Cc; Klausner, Jeffrey De; Balls, Joycea; Greenspan, Deborahb; Greenspan
Page-Shafer K, Veugelers PJ, Moss AR, Strathdee S, Kaldor JM, van Griensven GJ. Sexual risk behavior and risk factors for HIV-1 seroconversion in homosexual men participating in the Tricontinental Seroconverter Study, 1982-1994 [published erratum appears in Am J Epidemiol 1997 15 Dec; 146(12):1076]. Am J Epidemiol 1997, 146:531-542.

Studies which show the fallacy of relying on anecdotal evidence as opposed to carefully controlled study insofar as HIV transmission risk is concerned:

Jenicek M. "Clinical Case Reporting" in Evidence-Based Medicine. Oxford: Butterworth–Heinemann; 1999:117
Saltzman SP, Stoddard AM, McCusker J, Moon MW, Mayer KH. Reliability of self-reported sexual behavior risk factors for HIV infection in homosexual men. Public Health Rep. 1987 102(6):692–697.Nov–Dec;

Catania JA, Gibson DR, Chitwood DD, Coates TJ. Methodological problems in AIDS behavioral research: influences on measurement error and participation bias in studies of sexual behavior. Psychol Bull. 1990 Nov;108(3):339–362.

There is no debate (among experts) about the HIV risks associated with oral sex. The risk is so low that almost nobody who cares for HIV infected patients has ever had a patient believed to have been infected that way. Among experts, it's a semantic issue about using terms like "no risk" and "very low risk". There is no difference between my or Dr. Hook's use of "low risk" and other experts' "no risk".
DR. HANSFIELD

"And oral sex is basically safe sex -- completely safe with respect to HIV and although not zero risk for other STDs, the chance of infection is far lower than for unprotected vaginal or anal sex. Please educate yourself about the real risks. If you stick with oral sex and condom-protected vaginal or anal sex, you have no HIV worries and very little worry about other STDs. " DR HANSFIELD

"I am sure you can find lots of people who believe that HIV is transmitted by oral sex, but you will not find scientific data to support this unrealistic concern..." DR HOOK

"HIV is not spread by touching, masturbation, oral sex or condom protected sex."- DR. HOOK

in the public HIV Prevention forum of MedHelp, TEAK and the other moderators maintain that oral sex in all forms is a zero risk activity. Would you agree with this assessment?
I TOTALLY AGREE / DR GARCIA

"HIV is not spread by masturbation, through oral sex, through kissing or other casual contact." Dr.Hook

"The observation on thousands and thousands of observations is that HIV is not spread by oral sex (of any sort)." DR HOOK
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal

Thanks. A quick internet search on the issue provides mulitiple opinion on the matter. I do appreciate your input.
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal
Your research is incorrect. There is no risk from oral sex. Just read any 10 posts at random in any of the HIV forums. It's the most popular topic on the forums.
Helpful - 0
Have an Answer?

You are reading content posted in the HIV Prevention Community

Top HIV Answerers
366749 tn?1544695265
Karachi, Pakistan
370181 tn?1595629445
Arlington, WA
Learn About Top Answerers
Didn't find the answer you were looking for?
Ask a question
Popular Resources
Condoms are the most effective way to prevent HIV and STDs.
PrEP is used by people with high risk to prevent HIV infection.
Can I get HIV from surfaces, like toilet seats?
Can you get HIV from casual contact, like hugging?
Frequency of HIV testing depends on your risk.
Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) may help prevent HIV infection.