I've got my 6 weeks Duo results and its non-reactive
Thanks a lot, I think you must try to teach Teak and Lizzie lou some maners, he does help but sometimes he/ she is so rude. We posts beacuse we need help not to be treated like that. You are a helper comforter indeed and thanks a lot.
Enough is enough. What happen to someone else has nothing to do with you and your status.
Thanks for your encouraging words. Did you personaly know any cirtuation where status has changed after 6 weeks. or any stats if known.
a 6 week negative is a good INDICATION of your status and unlikely to change. WITH THAT BEING SAID...it is "possible" that it can.
not sure what more we can add. you MADE THE CHOICE to have unprotected sex...you have to wait it out.
test at 3 months.
Where are you guys can you treat my post please
A lot smaller chance now, as most people would have detectable antibodies, but still go ahead with the 12 weeks test, a 6 week neg is a good sign and hopefully you feel better leading up to your final test.
Reread the replies that you have been given.
I'm from the clinic now I'm still negative on ELISA rapid (six weeks post exposure), I've requested them to draw blood and it was sent to the lab, the results will be back on the 24 December 2009. Do you guys think that this result could still change after six weeks. I've read somewhere that it takes 2 to 6 weeks for the antibody to be produced, is there any chances that this results can change to positive.
the majority of people test pos by 4-6 or 6-8 weeks, you might not be part of the majority club, thus everyone should always take a 12 wk test. Take a test at 7-8 weeks for a hell of a good sign your good, just do 12 wk test.
most of these experts says DUO test is 90% - 95% accurate, what do say about these.
No it is not a contradiction. There is no advantage. No one is given medication for a recent infection. The US did not give an FDA approval for Duo tests just for that reason. Being able to detect earlier does not have anything to do with a conclusive negative test result. Just because someone does not test positive 4-6 post exposure does not guarantee a conclusive negative result.
I think you are contradicting yourself here, you said" DUO tests have NO difference in when a negative test is conclusive. DUO can help with early detection". Dont you think if it can detect the infection early, in the case of where it says negative don't you think its an advantage, caurse if it didn't detect an infection there is no any. To me you seem to disagree with most of the expect. Most including the manufactures said DUO can detect from two weeks after possible exposure and on your comments you disagree with whatever they say. Do you mean that a DUO test can say negative at three or four weeks and after 3 month positive, why do most of these experts says DUO test is 90% - 95% accurate, what do say about these.
DUO tests have NO difference in when a negative test is conclusive. DUO can help with early detection. Big Difference.
Some Sexual Health Clinics in Australia do regard the DUO test as conclusive past 6 weeks ,however our guidelines state 12 weeks as being the time for definitive results therefore Id still want to get that 12 week negative.
Duo test are NOT conclusive any earlier than any other tests.
Hi
As the other posters say ,symptoms are not a reliable way to judge hiv infection and can often be caused by anxiety. ARS usually consists of high fever, swollen glands (generally most of your glands). You didnt mention a fever and thats normally present with ARS ,so a good sign. The average time to seroconversion is 21 days and the antigen test is useful at this time ,so far so good but a bit too early for a definitive result. Most people will have a positive result if truly infected by 6-8 weeks if using modern testing methods. Id advise to get a test at 6 weeks a duo at this time if available is very encouraging ,if negative cofirm 100% at twelve weeks. Keep in mind the odds are in your favour and most experts agree a DUO test is conclusive psat 6 weeks but Id still want to get that confirmed as per the legal guidelines at twelve weeks ,just to be sure. Hope all work out for you and good luck.
I read somewhere that when you are injured you are on high risk since protein are all over the body. I just wanna know because On 22 Oct 2009 15 days before the exposure, I had an infection on my thigh and the doc gave me an antibiotics. By the time of exposure it was riped but covered with a badage (elastoplast). Does all this increase my risk, since they say the body will have the proteins.
PLEASE ANSWER my question, the last time I posted these question some of you guys didn't attend to my question can you please guys attend to my post
Hi Mchuvana,
I experience the same as you do..its only i experince the small bumps rash that appear and disappear the day after.It happen 5days after exposurre till now. I was soo worried that I took the 1month test and it was negative.Now I am 9th week post exposure..waiting for my 3month which is on Jan test.
Get your 3 month conclusive test.
Where are you guy cun I please here from all of you