That won't happen - My relationships are now exclusively monogamous and I always use a condom (since my one incident without). I have never advocated unsafe sex.
We'll see how your response changes "if" you contract HIV.
I agree with everything you say - I also wouldn't advocate playing Russian Roulette with a 2,000 chambered gun either.
I wasn't trying to justify unprotected sex as being safe - just trying to be realistic about the risk. Society and the media, and sometimes I've noticed, even this community forum tend to have a greatly amplified view on HIV risk, especially where heterosexual transmission is concerned.
Everybody else lectures safe sex and three month testing; I like to help people relax by helping them realize how low their risk really is.
Hi there,
"HIV has a very difficult time transmitting and it's not unusual for an HIV + and - couple to have sex for months or even years without transmission. "
I agree with the diffcult transmitting part...but one could get infected on the very first unprotected sex too.....
I advocate safe sex. Always use condom for sexual intercouse.
The Doctors on this site regularly quote the risk of unprotected vaginal sex with HIV + person at being less than 1 transmission in 1000 exposures (and that's often considered conservative!). HIV has a very difficult time transmitting and it's not unusual for an HIV + and - couple to have sex for months or even years without transmission. The people on this site tend to have a grossly inflated view on the risk of HIV transmission.
Symptoms mean absolutely nothing. The statistical chance that even a "perfect" symptomatic match with ARS is just another common viral infection is almost astronomically higher than the chance of it actually being ARS.
It is low, nobody can give a definite answer for this.
But this is still a risky behaviour that put you at risk.
No expert rely on symptoms to assess any situation. Testing is the only conclusive way.