If you believe you have been exposed to HIV and want help to judge your risk, would like advice about HIV testing, or have questions about the effectiveness of condoms or risks associated with specific sexual practices, this is the site for you.
I am on my last week of PEP which I started 43 hrs after exposure. I have now developed swollen nodes in the neck area and groin, nothing in my underarms, flakey rash on penis skin, pain in the urethra and a white patch on my tongue. I am very worried that PEP has failed and I am seroconverting. Any ideas from the forum? During my exposure, the condom broke and I did have a scratch on my penis head and that healed in about a day.
PEP efficacy seems to be a real blind spot in medical circles - much research has been done in treating known exposures to needlestick transfer blood to blood in health workers from known HIV positive patients, where transmission rate is at its most effective - depending on source's viral load and whether a shallow or deep puncture etc etc.
When PEP is prescribed for somebody who has engaged in risky sexual activity , it should only be done so when there has been an exposure to a confirmed HIV person and its efficacy is very hard to determine because there are less odds of a transmission than by needlestick and various other factors contribute to likelihood of transmission via sexual exposure.
Did you have an exposure to a ***confirmed*** HIV positive person?
I am gathering you were the insertive partner by what you are saying?
Reading a study of 700 people who engaged in risky activity and received PEP within the required time constraints, about 1% seroconverted - all 7 were gay men who engaged in receptive anal sex (it does not state whether or not they were also IV drug users), 4 of whom had a confirmed HIV pos partner - whether this indicates a failure of the PEP or not is unclear, because even when exposed to HIV there is not 100% guarantee of transmission - and in the particular study some of those who seroconverted engaged in further risky behaviour during PEP and possibly had done so prior to the actual 72hrs PEP regimen, with a completely different source. However the study does not state in detail how many of the other 693 participants had a confirmed HIV source.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. Med Help International, Inc. is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.