99% and where were those numbers pulled out of the air from?
How many people would get instantly poked by a syringe in the environment outside a healthcare setting--virtually zero and being cut by an item that HIV infected blood on it is definately no risk,the HIV becomes inactive on fomities like item.
So that means that some people who were poked/ cut with an item that had HIV blood on it would get infected? Why is everyone being told they have no risk, when if fact it would be a low risk?
The needlestick injury happens instantly and not all needlestick injuries result in infection--infact very few do.In the environment 99% of people who would have needlestick injury would not be at risk because the tip of the needle has already been exposed to air and therefore the virus has become inactive and unable to infect.