Protected Anal, Unprotected Oral - No ejaculation

[drsuess]

Hi Everyone,

I am kinda freaked out.  Had a male to male experience that consisted of:

1. Unprotected Oral 30 seconds(giving/receiving) - no ejaculation
2. Protected Receptive Anal Sex - no ejaculation

I think I read that unprotected oral is pretty much theoritical; is that true?  I didnt have any sores or cuts in mouth and there was no ejaculation.  For the protected anal, I looked at the condom when we stopped (he didnt ejaculate until masterbating) and it was covering his penis.  If there was a condom failure, would I know it?  Would the whole thing be busted.

I am married and concerned about my risk.  From what I read, its almost impossible to get HIV from giving oral without ejaculation and no documented cases.  Also, since the condom was completely covering his penis can I feel rest assured there was no holes in it and that I had no risk?

Thanks everyone!

[Brian123]

You had no risk. An intact condom is full protection against HIV. And if he "came" inside you,...believe me...you would have known it.

The oral sex part is not even on the radar to get tested for HIV.

I endorse your use of condoms for oral as well as any anal/vaginal sex with persons whose status is unknown if you do not want to continue to "doubt" the HIV factor.

If you are not comfortable with my answer, my best bet (and it is a gut feeling) you are not too comfortable with the sexual liasons with men and /or your sexual lifestyle.

[drsuess]

Thanks for the reply.  You are correct in many of your points; but I have been open with the wife about my curiousity and just trying to figure out what my curiousity means.

I know for a fact that he didnt *** as i stopped, he pulled out, pulled off the condom and masterbated until he came.

You put my mind at ease.  Thank you.

[drsuess]

I did not use a condom for the 30 seconds of oral.  Still no risk?

[Brian123]

indeed....NO risk