Hi - there was no full penetration for sure. Its really worrying me considering the minimal penetration which he was trying repeatedly. Could there be a possibility in such case? Thanks once again.
Hi - there was no full penetration for sure. Its really worrying me considering the minimal penetration which he was trying repeatedly. Could there be a possibility in such case? Thanks once again.
Only you would know, there would be no "might have", "maybe" or "what ifs."
Thank you!
1) but i was wondering because there were multiple attempts to penetrate, there might have been a length of penis that would have been inserted. Could that pose any risk considering pre-ejaculation or ejaculation present? I do remember it was hurting bad and i had to stop the guy from inserting any further. So, as far as i remember there was very minimal insertion.
2) Anything other than full penetration, to a greater extent, is not going to contribute to any transmission? Is this correct?
3) Oral and other modes of activities are low-risk, hence that would really not contribute to any transmission as well. Right?
I have read articles and other responses which detail that the transmission occurs when there is a direct route via the mucous membrane in the vagina. Considering that i do understand the risk is less but i just needed a response from someone who knows it all because its worrying me sick.
I really appreciate your time and help! Thanks again!
If you were never penetrated you never had an exposure.