Very understandable. If you want pay and post in the International Expert forum. Dr. Sean and Dr.Jose work for Freedom Health in the UK.
Thank you all for your help.
I've been getting so much different information from my own GUM clinic and another I visited. One says a weak reactive isn't equivocal, but where I had the tests done they say they are, then I've heard that the results are indeterminate, or borderline....or that an indeterminate or borderline is less 'true' than a weak reactive! SO confusing - and very stressful!
If you were positive the antibodies in the Duo test would have shown up and you would be positive. As Teak suggested try a different place to get tested and just have an antibody test done.
..and each were different types of Elisa assays...
Following each initial test a further three tests were done on each sample, each coming back negative.
..but these tests have been like this for about 9 months already in total!
..plus if on my last test they saw a weakly reactive result, it would surely be totally wrong for them to have just left it, right? Un less they were sure nothing was going on ie. as mentioned before, there hadn't been a change between those tests which were two months apart.
get tested after 3 months from a different lab for a all conclusive test.
there is nothing to worry. just to be sure get tested at 3 months from a different lab. which will have a different assay. it will negative for sure.
Yes, but I have had:
Isn't an Anti-HIV 1 / HIV 2 + P24AG a duo test? Testing for antibodies and antigen?
They did three tests for these...all different manufacturers.
A P24 test is not an antibody test. It's an antigen test.
They have all been antibody tests - and at the reference lab, all three seperate tests came back negative, as well as the p24 test.
Then go to another testing clinic and take just an antibody test.
I have just tested again. What if that too comes back as weakly positive? Surely after several months it would be due to something other than hiv by then, if two confirmatory tests have already rules out infection? Why would they not have tested the last test again if it was weakly reactive? Surely they just cant leave it unless they were sure it was ok - they said the results of that test were identical to the previous one.
You need the conclusive test result.
Ah ok. So, I think that as two of my tests were sent to reference lab and came back negative (three different 4th gen elisa tests were done there) that my results are possibly caused by something that is maybe not hiv.
My last test came back as weakly reactive but they said there was no need to send it for more testing as it came back with the same result of the test two months before.
They are call indeterminate. Yes they are common. It means you are neither positive or negative and will have to retest.
Does anyone know if persistent weakly reactive results are common? Mine have been going on for several months now.
I don't believe that a rapid test was done. I gave a sample from my vein.
As the weakly positive test form a "quick test"?
Negative/non-reactive, positive/reactive or equivocal-neither positive nor negative.
I would not worry about it either since you are getting negative results on confirmation tests.
Yes, I meant 'NOT' - sorry!
I'm wondering if it this particular test used first each time that keeps showing as equivocal/weakly reactive that is the problem. The other three confirmatory tests all show as negative.
By the way, is a weakly reactive result often referred to as equivocal when talking about antibody tests? I'm guessing there are three outcomes - negative, weakly reactive or positive. Any idea?
Well a DUO test is positive would be positive at 4 weeks because of the antigens part of the test.
You don't have a positive test and that combined with your non-risks and I assume you meant "I've been told 'NOT' to worry". It is more fearful because you have the unknown infront of you and your mind is wondering to all possibilities.
Surely if my last test is showing as weakly reactive they cant just leave it? They say they don't need to send it to the reference lab for further testing as the result was identical to the test two months previous.
Or maybe they feel that HIV isn't the cause of these results?